Pakistan’s FATF grey-listing should not come as a surprise to anyone

Published: June 29, 2018
SHARES
Email

Mainstreaming extremist groups looks good on paper; however, it also comes at a cost.

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) plenary meeting in Paris has reportedly decided to keep Pakistan on its grey list; a decision that has surprised many in Pakistan. Pakistan has been kept on the so-called grey list which includes countries accused of financing or aiding terrorism.

The FATF was established in 1989 – with its headquarters in Paris – and its main objectives include combating financing of terrorism, money laundering and other elements pertaining to the integrity of the international financial system.

Even though Pakistan has surely not done enough to get off the grey list, the FATF failed to bring into consideration the fact that the country is currently governed by an interim setup. The interim setup’s mandate and priority number one is holding July polls on time. Hence, focusing on matters of international concern are way down its priority list. By not factoring in this transitional period, the FATF might have somewhat validated concerns or allegations (by Pakistan) that its decisions might be influenced by Pakistan’s rivals.

However, this should not be a valid excuse for Pakistan.

Even if the FATF is, in some way, allegedly influenced by the US and India, it was Pakistan’s inaction against terror financing that gave the watchdog enough reasons to keep it on the list. Since February’s listing, Pakistan had more than three months to take concrete measures to thwart global perceptions that the country was responsible for financing terror outfits, mainly the Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD) and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT).

However, with Hafiz Saeed’s aides and associates contesting the upcoming polls, Pakistan’s case is becoming weaker by the day. Moreover, the unfreezing of assets of Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat (ASWJ)’s Ahmed Ludhianvi also puts a major question mark on Pakistan’s efforts and weakens its FATF case.

Ironically, Ludhianvi’s decision coincides with Pakistan committing to a comprehensive 26-point action plan at the FATF, spanning 15 months, to avoid being put on the black list. The action plan requires Pakistan to choke terror financing of groups such as the Islamic State (IS), al Qaeda, the Haqqani Network, JuD, LeT and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM).

It is also unfair, in the current situation, to blame the outgoing Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government alone for this fiasco. Everyone involved in the policy-making process, including the military and bureaucracy, should also be equally held responsible for Pakistan’s global shame.

Where the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR)’s spokesperson alluded to proposals for mainstreaming extremist groups, the diplomats, on the other hand, also failed to present an effective case both globally and at the FATF. Finally, the Sharif-led government, embroiled in its own Panama/Iqama fiasco in the final years, gave little attention to this issue. On top of that, the unchecked entry, and progression, of hate-inciting Tehreek-e-Labaik Pakistan (TLP) and its leader Khadim Hussain Rizvi also showed lack of Pakistan’s seriousness in this regard.

Mainstreaming extremist groups looks good on paper; however, it also comes at a cost. A cost that creates complications for the country in global politics and bilateral relations, along with it global financial transactions are kept under strict scrutiny and are taking longer than usual time.

Even though Pakistan’s interim setup is currently busy in the day-to-day management for the upcoming elections, taking corrective measures to get the country off the grey list should be an equal priority. If Pakistan – in the worst case scenario – is added to the FATF blacklist in future, the incumbent government would have a major task on hand to undo the damage caused in the international arena. Where Pakistan’s forex reserves and exports are already on a constant downward spiral, getting on the blacklist would only make things worse. Moreover, in case of inadequate action, Pakistan might even find it hard to keep its friends, mainly China, on board. China has occasionally voiced concerns in this regard, and hence wants Pakistan to take concrete action.

Unlike the current social media trend in Pakistan, blaming a single party or entity – whether the PML-N or the Army – for the grey-listing is not the solution. If the country aims to come clean and get its name off the grey list, only a concerted effort – with the united civil-military leadership – against extremist, militant and terror groups is the need of the day.

Farooq Yousaf

Farooq Yousaf

The author is a PhD (Politics) Candidate currently pursuing his studies in Australia. He has previously completed his Masters in Public Policy and Conflict Studies from Germany. He also consults Islamabad-based Security think tank, Centre for Research and Security Studies, and occasionally writes for various news and media sources. He is specialising in Indigenous conflict resolution and counter insurgency. He tweets at @faruqyusaf (twitter.com/faruqyusaf?lang=en)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • http://www.sepia-paper.deviantart.com Muhammed Waqar Younis

    Just because they don’t like us people doesn’t mean we have get on our knees to make them like us.

    The next thing they will ask after banning all forms of “Islamic” stuff from our country is to denuclearize and bend over like Iraq, Afghanistan for their interest.Recommend

  • fahim

    It is not surprise because our book tell us already whatever you do THEY can’t be satisfied with you unless you change your religion.Recommend

  • ThePatriot

    Pakistani Bloggers seem to be the only people who think that reporting Pakistan with some bad words is going to benefit them. And the bloggers all around the world keep defending their own countries.Recommend

  • numbersnumbers

    As you well know, the FATF action had nothing to do with “liking” Pakistan, and everything to do with Pakistan’s historic failure to act against known terrorist group support and financing in Pakistan!Recommend

  • jssidhoo

    Stick to your thinking and have a partyRecommend

  • Xahid

    Why don’t you go to dictate Pakistani Judges, what is the “right judgement”?
    Pakistani govt. can’t overrule the judges. and your whole claim is based on “Anti Judgement” and Indian/American Baseless propaganda.Recommend

  • Raj

    But sir, Pakistan was given a very long rope since 2015 and when proper governemnts were in place Pakistan did nothing. Now, for the past one month only internim government is there. Do you want to say that, during interim government, pakistan can still sponsor terrrosim and the FATF shoud ignore just because, interim governmnet is there in pakistan? Also, how do you explain when terorrists are main streamed even during the interim government. IS that oK?Recommend

  • Lalit

    Kindly carry on with your “Islamic” stuff.its quiet beneficial for us.Recommend

  • Patwari

    With an already faltering economy, because of bureaucratic
    corruption and fake numbers, with 3 or 4 paisas, left in the
    treasury, [the rest was looted long ago, by every thug politician/
    bureaucrat] be prepared to eat dal and one roti every other day,
    chawwal, once a week. Meat, maybe, once a month….
    Blame ALL your troubles on your thug corrupt politicians, who
    left YOU holding the bag.
    In Punjab, every terrorist/banned outfit has ‘chanda boxes’ in
    each and every bazaar. Money is donated freely to them. Govt.
    looks the other way. And you wonder why FAFT put you on a list?
    If things don’t improve, try growing some vegetables on a piece of
    land…….next to a madrassa.Recommend

  • Patwari

    Pakistan is not like Hindustan. Where the illiterate masses follow Modi Sarkar’s
    every word. Where they defend extremism/terrorism against Muslims and every
    minority. Like Love Jihad, Ghar Wapsi, Gau Raksha, Beef Vigilantism.
    By your logic, it is all right to defend a govt. that supports extremists/terrorists
    plus also does looting and plundering? Do not stand up for what’s right and
    what’s wrong? Just support blindly? Like the Hindu Rashtra? Now that!…is rich!
    “Because bloggers must defend their country”…according to you.
    The Germans did exactly this, supported blindly, in the ’20’s and ’30’s. And paid
    a very very heavy price for it.
    [read history].Recommend

  • Sane

    The ‘grey listing’ is not done due to terrorism charges, but on money laundering. FATF does not have mandate relevant to terrorism. If any country is to be put on such a list due to terrorism, that must be INDIA, the country of RAPISTS and MURDERERS.Recommend

  • Sane

    What about HINDUWTA TERRORISM and RAPING women, specially tourists in INDIA? Can’t you discuss that?!!Recommend

  • Sane

    Very true and absolutely correct.Recommend

  • numbersnumbers

    The FATF deals with AML (anti money laundering) and CTF (counter terrorism financing) regimes! All should read today’s ET editorial “Demystifying FATF’s Grey List”!Recommend