For a nation surviving on dharnas, Pakistan does not know how, when or what to protest

Published: January 28, 2018
SHARES
Email

Supporters of Pakistan Awami Tehreek (PAT), Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) carry their party flags during an anti-government protest rally in Lahore on January 17, 2018. PHOTO: AFP

On January 17th, with the attendance and acceptance of Imran Khan and Asif Ali Zardari, two of the most powerful men in Pakistani politics, Tahirul Qadri boldly declared the collective opposition push towards ‘an end of the Sharif Sultanate’. Before the protest demonstration of thousands amassed in Lahore, the Pakistani news cycle had been dominated by the abduction, rape and murder of Zainab, a seven-year-old girl from Kasur.

Zainab did come up in the speeches at the protest. It is perhaps retrospectively a good thing that she often only came up as a side-note, for when she was discussed, she was weaponised by the leaders to call for an end to the current government’s rule. In those moments, the basic problem with political protest in Pakistan was most apparent – the main priority was power, and everything else was secondary.

Of course, there is nothing wrong with calling for accountability of leaders in government – they are at least partially responsible for the worse that befalls us, and this includes the tragic cases of Zainab, MashalMalala and countless other innocents. The problem, however, is that unlike most democracies across the world, Pakistani political parties don’t organise on the basis of issues which directly impact their citizens, but for a change in power as a remedy to influence those issues.

In the US, Senator Bernie Sanders holds rallies regularly to vie for free college education and healthcare. In the UK, Labour Party firebrand Jeremy Corbyn has advocated for non-interventionism in foreign affairs. Even in neighbouring India, the Aam Aadmi Party’s Arvind Kejriwal has organised demonstrations against the involvement of multinational corporations in India.

The problems with the Pakistani model of organised political protest are apparent. It sends a message across the country that for those who rule over us, issues such as rape, rampant poverty and ruthless discrimination of minorities take a backseat in favour of vying for power. It is also self-harming, in that because political parties rarely use protest to take bold positions on issues, there is an ambiguity present in their stances that no published manifesto can clear out. It is no coincidence that there is a strong apathy for the political system, where all parties are just seen as more of the same, with no hope for change. This corresponds with a nationwide Gallup Poll, which found that 45% of Pakistanis expressed apathy or a lack of interest towards active political participation.

More directly, it impedes on the ability of the political system to create meaningful, positive change for the ones it claims to serve. If political parties were to gather in protest to solve issues with the vigour that Qadri and Imran had at the 2014 dharna in the capital, actual – albeit incremental – change could have been achieved. The success of this approach is evident in the Pakistan Peoples Party’s (PPP) protest against the hike in petroleum prices in November, when the government responded by lowering petroleum rates, and by the Awami Worker Party’s valiant involvement in the katchi abadi case.

Most importantly, however, this protest mentality of “we’ll fix everything once you vote for us” is an indignity to those who give their voice to political parties when they don’t have a voice of their own. Although the main institution of representative democracy is the electoral system, that is not its purpose. The teleology of democracy is to lend an ear to those who are not powerful enough to stand alone against the ills that befall them, and push for positive change, unadulterated of ambition for power.

In the absence of the strong presence and support of organised political units such as political parties, fighting for the issues of the day is left to Pakistan’s civil society. But no matter how well intentioned these men and women may be, their capacity to influence change pales in comparison to all the good that could be done by the country’s massive, well-resourced and well-connected political parties.

While the next protests against the incumbent government are planned out for the coming weeks, Pakistanis will continue to suffer, because they have been told that democracy is a waiting game. For every day we wait, Pakistan will create another Malala, another Mashal, and another Zainab. This waiting game is an illusion, fabricated by the political system to keep power within itself, without using said power to govern the people and aid them in the problems that they wanted to escape when they ventured to the ballot box.

There is a time for politics, and there is time for humanity. For the political parties that represent Pakistan’s 200 million, the latter is just a tool to do the former. Until this prioritisation changes, no change shall come, no matter who occupies the corridors of power.

Hamza Tariq

Hamza Tariq

The author is set to start a BSc in International Relations degree at the London School of Economics. He worked as an intern under Ambassador Haqqani at Hudson Institute and under Dr Ishrat Hussain at the Woodrow Wilson Center. He tweets as @hamzataq (twitter.com/hamzataq)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • vinsin

    Agree with the author but I still have question. Based on TNT, Pakistan should not have any protests. One of the most contentious issues between Jinnah and Gandhi was protests. Jinnah never participated in any protests. He believed real power comes from votes and parliamentary seats. He also questioned the whole idea of protests in democracy. When you can vote, why protests?Recommend

  • Omar K Cheema

    what drugs are you smoking brother?
    this is the first time anyone has ever heard that protests are against Two Nation Theory.

    Recommend

  • Sane sid

    That is wrong model of governance and cannot be called a democracy….. In a democratic setup protest are meant to keep the actions of people in power in check. They cannot do what fancies their mind just because they got more votes. I believe Gandhi was far sighted and brought up a better model….Recommend

  • vinsin

    Tell me atleast one protest that Jinnah or Muslim league ever participated in.Recommend

  • vinsin

    Gandhi is famous for that only, around the world; Civil Rights Movements, non-violent protests etc. Before Gandhi that was the model of democracy. Government can do what ever they want if they have votes but others should have the right to protests non-violently for their rights.Recommend

  • Sane sid

    I think you missed the point….. Protests do not go with Greed for Power….Recommend