If Pakistan does not want to be pushed to ‘do more’, then its economy should not be so vulnerable

Published: October 18, 2017

A currency dealer counts Pakistani rupees and U.S. dollars at his shop in Karachi. PHOTO: REUTERS

Nothing remains constant in Pakistan, not even perceptions. Such is the sad state of affairs of Pakistan’s geo-politics and economy. It was only a few months ago, in May, that Pakistan had been upgraded to the MSCI Emerging Markets status, opening door to global investors and economic analysts. Since then, however, the situation has changed drastically, and we continue to surprise investors at home and abroad, this time with our ability to turn things around for the worse.

Despite a 10-year high economic growth and billion-dollar investments under the ambitious One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative, Pakistan’s economy has yet again revealed how vulnerable it is. The gravity of the matter is highlighted when General Qamar Javed Bajwa, the Chief of Army Staff (COAS), feels compelled to comment on pitfalls such as a sky-high debt, low tax-to-GDP ratio, and a high current account deficit.

In an earlier blog, I had mildly frowned upon the idea of becoming an economic power while also being a responsible nuclear-armed state. Incidentally, our COAS invoked the very same bread (economy) versus guns (military) mantra and admitted that the country’s economic growth has been stunted due to national security being its priority.

The economic think tanks have shown behaviour patterns similar to that of sleep-deprived night coach drivers in Pakistan. Though the passengers believe they will reach home safe and on time, this is contingent upon the driver’s ability to focus so late at night. For our economic analysts, the focus was lost with the arrival of the Panama Papers case, which consumed most of their time and attention, and distracted them from focusing on the fragile state of our economy.

After Nawaz Sharif’s ousting, it is predictable to see Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leaders pushing anti-judiciary and anti-military rhetoric around. On the other hand, our military is also well aware of the consequences of derailing democratic government – sanctions, public anarchy, civil rifts and delays in policy-making. As a result, they have provided constant assurances that there are no civil-military rifts and that the military is in total support of the judiciary and democracy itself. This became evident when the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) confirmed that there was no chance of martial law being imposed, or when the COAS made a courtesy call to wish Kulsoom Nawaz a speedy recovery.

If PML-N leaders do not try to mend ties and do not advise Maryam or Nawaz to mellow down and stop acting like the Recep Erdogan of Pakistan, then they are in the wrong. Being in the driving seat of the vehicle that is Pakistan, the leaders of the ruling party should show maturity and urgency in light of the serious security threats and economic crises faced by the nation.

Just as the international world is upping the ante against North Korea for refusing to cooperate as it develops nuclear armaments, a nuclear- armed Muslim state is also a matter that leads to concern in the international community. The Iran nuclear deal is an example of this. Our position in the international community is thus not as strong as it once was. There are no doubts as to the tone of the western world, or that of India, whose premier Narendra Modi has on multiple occasions pledged to isolate Pakistan.

Similar statements were given by US Secretary of Defence James Mattis and Afghan foreign ministry’s deputy spokesperson, Sebghat Saba. The latter, while speaking about the agenda for the sixth quadrilateral meeting of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group (QCG), questioned Pakistan’s honesty when it comes to fulfilling promises, especially those made in front of the US or China. This is not only a harsh statement from a weakened state, but also an embarrassing moment for Pakistan. When other states question us or accuse us of spreading terrorism, as Sushma Swaraj did recently at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), not only does it reflect badly on our state but also affects our economy and investment prospects.

In such turbulent times, the last thing anyone in Pakistan needs is discontinuity in our economic growth. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is an excellent opportunity for economic growth as we do not have many choices when it comes to international lenders willing to splurge money on our dilapidated infrastructure. Those belonging to the middle class and borrowing in order to attend university, either locally or internationally, will feel precisely how weak the economy has become. The economy is struggling and Chinese investments are its saving grace, leaving the ball in the court of millions of Pakistanis. How will we take advantage of the improved infrastructure and surplus electricity?

The answer is policy-making.

Our country is not bereft of intellectual talent by any standards. Haroon Akhtar and his team were hired to increase tax revenues of Pakistan, which are showing signs of improvement, since revenue-to-GDP has increased from 9% to 13%. However, hiring a private sector team to enhance exports would have been a smart decision on his part. It is understandable if the experts do not wish to depreciate the currency further.

However, if a 6% rebate is given on $6 billion exports per annum incrementally, this will cost the exchequer $360 million, allowing the government to easily absorb it as a subsidy worth 0.12% of the GDP. Not only would this allay fears of exporters and industrialists along with reducing media critique, but Pakistan would also progress better, with exports increasing from $20 billion to $26 billion while the cost of its fiscal deficit increases from 4.5% to 4.62%.

Economic growth becomes less of a concern if you have the right people doing the right job at the right time. But if the country keeps spiralling under political chaos the way it is right now, the focus and progress is lost and fruitless, and unfortunately, the night coach derails. What is required at the moment is putting the interests of the country above political parties and internal politics, since the situation is as fragile as they seem. Geo-politically, it is time for Pakistan to form a new axis of regional economic power.

The BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) were never meant to get along with the other nations who aspire to become bigger powers. Perhaps this is our cue to gather an alliance and form CRIPTIN (China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Nigeria), as according to a PwC report, these seven countries would be among the 20 largest economies in the world on the basis of purchasing power parity.

Even though Pakistan is likely to become the 16th largest economy by 2050, it is at an inflection point – it can either grow to be part of the new world order or continue being pushed to “do more”. But if we are to be less dependent on the US and have a ‘no-more-do-more’ policy, that will definitely require some economic transformation.

Arslaan Asif Soomro

Arslaan Asif Soomro

The author has a degree in Investment Management from Cass Business School, London and has also obtained CFA and FRM qualifications. He is currently working as a Senior Advisor to Swedish based Tundra Fonder AB. He tweets at @AAHSoomro (twitter.com/AAHSoomro)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Test Test

    If this is the quality of brains Pakistan has, India has nothing to worry about. The author talks about China, Russia and 5 other muslim countries. Except probably Indonesia, none of the others really matter. Look at world economy today, in PPP terms, China, US and India are 1, 2 and 3. And the next set of countries are not even close. In 50 years, this gap will become even more pronounced. China will probably be 1.5 times India and India > US. These 3 countries if they trade between themselves will be sufficient. they can have pacts between themselves and can virtually rule the world. (may or may not happen) but any other set of countries and this includes European countries will not matter. Thats the part you need to look at. Today US, EU are about 18T$, China 10T$, India at 2.5 T$ (in real terms) so EU still matters. But in 50 years because of a whole set of factors, most countries other than the top 3 will have minimal say in world affairs. Most likely India and US will be similar and work together and China will have to be alone or if they have enough brains (all 3 countries leadership), they will work together and just rule the world.Recommend

  • Rahul

    This is a path down which Pakistan has gone down many times before. Pakistan has had 21 IMF Bailouts in 70 years, that must be some kind of record
    There are two big reasons Pakistan goes to the IMF again and again. One is the large family size. Average Pakistani family has 4-5 children, this means there are no savings in the economy and all investment takes place via borrowing while the women remain out of the work force, looking after children. The second is the disproportionate military expenditure. Unless Pakistan tackles these two problems, no amount of planning, devaluation, austerity etc. are going to work.Recommend

  • KlingOn2K

    Pakistan’s economy has not been self-sustaining for 70 years. How is it suddenly expected to become one when defence expenditure and corruption is through the roof? Even if all corruption is stopped, Pakistan will still be in a hole.Recommend

  • Rohan

    So if you’re economy is stronger you will promote terrorismRecommend

  • Hassan Mirza

    The resident of Pakistan have all the excuses to blame others but them self ? corruption and greed to become over night rich is the ultimate mind set without any thing doing drum beating day night on none issue is favourite hobbies of Pakistan nation. without work and with corruption how any country goes forward ?Recommend

  • numbersnumbers

    Author avoids talking about Pakistan’s pathetic Tax-to-GDP ratio which causes all the financial pain, but no one is even remotely interested in bring the super rich Pakistani Feudals and elites into the tax net!Recommend