Why an alliance with PTI will prove to be detrimental for MQM
Lately, there has been a lot of buzz about the possibility of an alliance between the Muttahida Quami Movement – that is now divided into MQM-Pakistan (MQM-P) and MQM-London (MQM-L) – and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) at a federal level. Furthermore, this alliance is allegedly to replace the current opposition leader, Khursheed Shah of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), with someone nominated by PTI.
It is said that all politics are realpolitik and eventually realist concerns dictate what political parties actually do. PTI and MQM, given their history of intense confrontation, would prove this saying true if this alliance materialises. Both the parties have been clashing since 2007; PTI has accused MQM of murder, extortion and sponsoring terrorism in Karachi. If they carry through with this coalition, it will add another U-turn in a long series of PTI’s U-turns (case in point: The PTI and Jamat-e-Islami (JI) alliance).
The problems between the two parties began on May 12, 2007, when Karachi witnessed large-scale violence allegedly perpetuated by radicals belonging to MQM. The reasons behind this were to show support to former president General Pervez Musharraf by preventing the then chief justice, Iftikhar Chaudhary from addressing the bar council.
Following this violence, Imran Khan became one of the fiercest critics of MQM and its leader, Altaf Hussain. More than anything, it was Imran’s fierce stance against MQM and his open support of the lawyers’ movement that gave him and his party the significant boost it needed. Before the lawyers’ movement, PTI was a political minnow with little to no weight in national politics. The media coverage for the movement propelled Imran to a figure of national stature. Furthermore, through this, he began to gain the support of Pakistan’s white-collared, urban middle-class. Although PTI really came of age in 2011 with their famous Lahore rally, the ascent had started back in 2007.
Subsequently, PTI also lodged a case against Altaf in Scotland Yard and from that point onwards, the relations between the two parties continued to deteriorate. The crux of their hostility reached its peak when PTI’s Zahra Shahid was killed on May 10, 2013. Imran, in fact, accused MQM of her murder.
Then, in 2015, PTI fought a bitter by-election which it lost by a huge margin.
However, during all these years, despite the problems, there were occasional talks of a possible alliance. In 2010, MQM’s leader Ali Raza Abidi, while criticising Imran on the latter’s various stances also indicated that both parties had some similarities.
In fact, those so-called similarities were acknowledged by Imran, in an interview, when he claimed that his party’s “natural” alliance was with MQM as both parties were of middle-class origin. MQM’s supreme leader, Altaf, also occasionally alluded to both the parties’ middle-class roots and once invited Shah Mehmood Qureshi for an alliance.
However, during Altaf’s time, such possibilities were difficult to materialise as PTI always had issues with him. The talks of a possible coalition really gathered pace after Altaf started to lose grip over MQM and the party split between the Karachi and London groups. Imran congratulated MQM for distancing itself from its founder and reiterated that both the parties were “similar.”
Now, it finally seems that a formal alliance is on the cards as the need to de-seat Khursheed Shah as the opposition leader has brought the two parties closer. With Altaf out of the picture, and elections nearing, this may become an electoral alliance in the future.
Nevertheless, will this development strengthen the democratic process in Pakistan and align like-minded parties? Alternatively, is it merely a marriage of necessity?
From a realpolitik angle, both parties stand to gain. MQM-P’s major beef is with PPP’s Sindh government and it would like to increase its bargaining power through an alliance with PTI. For PTI, on the other hand, this is an opportunity to pave the way for an electoral alliance in the future, which could prove instrumental in its bid for getting the required number of seats in the National Assembly (NA).
However, I doubt that it is a “natural” or positive development, even from an ideological perspective. There are similarities between the parties, in the sense that both are largely urban parties and have middle and lower middle-class vote banks.
Nevertheless, the differences between the two parties are much starker. MQM-P is an ethnic party, which has consistently argued against the state-cultivated narrative, which tries to subdue ethnic identities by overstressing religion. Its natural alliance is with other ethnic nationalist parties and not with PTI as the latter is the ideal political manifestation of the state-cultivated narrative. In the Pakistani context, MQM-P is a quasi-secular party whereas PTI is a right-wing party, which constantly whips religious nationalism.
Furthermore, despite a history of violence, MQM-P actually has progressive credentials. It played an important role in the amendment of the Hudood Ordinance in 2006, vehemently opposed the implementation of Shariah Law in Swat in 2009, and tried to project women in its party structure.
In contrast, PTI is a thoroughly reactionary party which eulogised the Taliban in the past and gave an apologetic defence to their activities. Furthermore, it also opposed amendments in the Hudood Ordinance and opposed the Women’s Protection Bill in 2016. It constantly whips up religion and is in alliance with JI, easily the most conservative party in Pakistan.
Given these stark differences, I really doubt that an alliance between the two parties is “natural”. Whatever its faults, MQM-P remains a liberal and secular party. In fact, since Altaf has lost his hold over the party and with the Rangers’ operation, its militant aspect has also weakened substantially. It is now poised to play a more positive role in the social and political landscape of Pakistan. A long-term alliance with a right-wing and regressive party like PTI would actually be detrimental for MQM-P, and I sincerely hope that it stays away from PTI.
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.