Sharjeel Khan crunches one through the off side, Australia v Pakistan, 2nd ODI, Melbourne, January 15, 2017. PHOTO: GETTY

Money, fame, respect and glory – it was all there for Sharjeel Khan, but it still wasn’t enough

Neither is he lucky enough to have age on his side nor does he enjoy the public sympathy that Amir was able to garner.

Hamza Junaid September 05, 2017
It’s the last ball of the 22nd over. Pakistan is chasing a mammoth total against Australia in the fifth ODI at Adelaide. Sharjeel Khan is standing strong and handsome at 70 with Pakistan’s hopes of winning resting on his shoulders. Adam Zampa throws a tossed up delivery outside the off stump, Khan has a good look at it before he powerfully swings his bat across the line and sends the ball sailing over the wide-on boundary for a six.

Sharjeel Khan pulls, Australia v Pakistan, 5th ODI, Adelaide, January 26, 2017. Photo: AFP

The ball I just recalled could potentially be the last time we see Khan smash a boundary wearing Pakistan’s national jersey as the five-year ban imposed on Khan could mean the end to his short-lived career.

This is not the first time that Pakistan has failed to protect its players from the beast called spot-fixing. I used the analogy between spot-fixing and a beast because of its cult appetite for consuming bright promising careers. Mohammad Asif, Mohammad Amir and now Khan, each one of them were a shining prospect for Pakistan before their careers took a turn for the worse and got entangled in the jaws of spot-fixing.

Sharjeel Khan celebrates his half-century, Pakistan v West Indies, 1st ODI, Sharjah, September 30, 2016. Photo: Getty

The most mind-boggling question is how individuals shining at the highest possible level of the cricket world, be lured onto a road to self-destruction? Khan had cemented his place in the national side for ODIs and T20s and he had just made his first breakthrough in the playing XI of the strong Pakistani Test line-up. If this wasn’t enough, he also had a heavy cheque awaiting him from Leicestershire county club. Success was literally glaring Khan in the eyes and he blinked.

Money, fame, respect and glory; it was all there for Khan, yet he risked it all. Everything he had dreamed to achieve as a kid was in his palms but somehow it still wasn’t enough. It makes me wonder if living your dream doesn’t stop a player from spot-fixing, then what will? Or dare I ask, is there a cure for this insatiable beast at all?

Sharjeel Khan reacts on getting to his hundred, Ireland v Pakistan, 1st ODI, Malahide, August 18, 2016. Photo: AFP

International Cricket Council (ICC) tried to grab the beast by its horns and slapped the trio of Salman Butt, Asif and Amir with lengthy bans from international cricket. Amir’s tragic fall, in particular, was supposed to be a lesson for generations to come. As it turned out, it only took a handful of years before the next victim of spot-fixing has emerged from our very own Pakistan Super League (PSL).

Sharjeel Khan celebrates his century, Islamabad United v Peshawar Zalmi, Pakistan Super League, 3rd Qualifying final, Dubai, February 21, 2016. Photo: PCB

The voices asking for lifetime bans become louder and clearer after Khan’s case.  It seems even Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is pushing for a lifetime ban as it plans on filing an appeal for a harsher punishment against Khan. On the face of it, lifetime bans seem like an answer to fixing, however, if it doesn’t work, what’s next?

Raising the level of punishment may induce more fear in players but it doesn’t shut down the booming betting market. Fixing has been lurking in cricket’s own backyard ever since the beginning. Across the border sits the biggest betting market in the cricket world and it is reported that millions of rupees are bet on each match of Indian Premier League (IPL). Similarly, as soon as PSL hit some fame, fixing crept its way in. I just feel that when stakes are high, fixing is bound to exist.

Sharjeel Khan plays the ball into the leg side, India v Pakistan, World T20 2016, Group 2, Kolkata, March 19, 2016. Photo: AFP

To eradicate fixing from cricket completely, one will have to reverse the actions taken to commercialise the sport but monitoring power-packed T20 leagues around the globe is a task beyond ICC’s capacity. Loopholes will continue to exist for spot-fixing and will ultimately find their way into these lucrative T20 leagues. Since money has become a superior priority for this gentleman’s game, fixing is here to stay regardless of lifetime bans.

It is yet to be seen whether a five-year or lifetime ban will have an impact on players to come or not. All we know for now is that it’s time to say goodbye to Khan because his chances of returning back to cricket are rather bleak. Neither is he lucky enough to have age on his side nor does he enjoy the public sympathy that Amir was able to garner. To make matters worse, Fakhar Zaman is the new sensation for the nation and Khan, on the other hand, is a fading memory. I hate to say it folks, but another one bites the dust!
WRITTEN BY:
Hamza Junaid The author is an avid cricket follower and plays for a team called Gladiators based in New York. He tweets as @hamza_junaid1 (https://twitter.com/hamza_junaid1)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (9)

Aamir | 6 years ago | Reply Great article Hamza!
Hamza Junaid | 6 years ago Thank You !
Sufiyan | 6 years ago | Reply "Make hay while the sun is shinning" - That's the story of Sharjeel, Amir, Asif and Salman Butt. These cricketers came from humble backgrounds and got a shot at earning a fortune whether the means were legal or illegal. I want to say let this be a lesson for future Cricketers to learn from but unfortunately that's not going to happen.
Hamza Junaid | 6 years ago Thats the most painful part. Another talented player will go to waste but the lesson will still not be learned as seen in past as well.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ