The problem with Imran Khan’s CNN interview is his hypocrisy that is too palpable to ignore

Published: August 30, 2017
SHARES
Email

PHOTO: SCREENSHOT

In an era of hyper-nationalism bordering on fascist tendencies, a strongly crafted statement works wonders for your public image. 

This is exactly what we witnessed recently. America’s recent tragedy, otherwise also known as President Donald Trump, was found to be ruffling some spiteful feathers yet again. But Trump said what all American leaders have already said about Pakistan (we’ve been compared to cancer and called an international migraine, for starters). He also threatened Pakistan with the stoppage of American aid if we don’t “do more”.

Been there, heard that.

In came Imran Khan to rescue Pakistan from this shared sense of shame. In a CNN interview with Hala Gorani, Imran proved to be the champion of words that he has reduced himself to. Truth be told, Pakistanis would have hailed any leader speaking fluent English, but here, the man was also making sense.

Voila, the retweet button was abused and the interview was shared numerous times on social media platforms.

“He has slapped Trump!”, commented one sentimental fellow furiously.

“America must be scared now”, said another.

But if we scrutinise Imran’s statements, what he said only seems to be hollow bravado, something he’s made a signature style out of for himself.

And once again, Imran proved that he’s the hero we deserve, not necessarily the one we need. If it’s only a populist politician we’re doomed to elect, Imran loses his distinction amongst the myriad of numerous options we currently have.

And since the interview is already making rounds on social media platforms and it’s only a matter of time before it is registered as a national treasure, I thought about writing on it to ask certain questions. In my defence, I am putting forth these questions to seek answers and justifications. Many readers might disagree and claim it’s lifafa (envelope) business, but it is not.

In the beginning of the interview, Imran seemed to be stuck on the “not our war” narrative, but since so much has been written on the fallacy of this view, it’s futile to discuss it again.

Imran’s blatant opposition to Operation Zarb-e-Azb is still fresh in many minds and I think it’s funny when he celebrates the “security” of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) on Twitter without any apparent sense of irony. If you are against armed offensive against the terrorists (which Imran is in this interview and otherwise), you lose all moral and political prerogative to celebrate its achievements. He is always congratulating our police forces on this victory (whose efforts and sacrifices have undoubtedly been enormous), yet overlooks the actual war machinery that was used to achieve the current state we find ourselves in.

Probably because that would weaken his ‘only dialogue’ narrative or probably not. Who are we to judge?

Perhaps more important is the aid issue. When Gorani asked Imran about the discontinuation of financial aid from Trump’s side, he was quick to brush off the topic with a flick of his brow. He termed the aid as very “costly” for Pakistan and suggested we’re better off without it.

Talk the talk, done. Walk the walk? Well… as I write this, there are a number of the USAID projects running in the province under Imran’s K-P government. Refer to the interactive map on the USAID’s website for further details. And here is what bothers me. It is easy to blame the boogeyman, but when will Imran ask these projects to wind up and rid his province from American interference? They might not tell you this, but the USAID is an American federal government agency and it has made its purpose quite clear. Its official website says,

“US foreign assistance has always had the twofold purpose of furthering America’s interests while improving lives in the developing world.”

Moreover, the USAID lists “strengthen democracy and good governance” amongst its primary goals. In 2017 alone, the agency has spent more than $20.49 million on democracy, human rights and governance in Pakistan.

So much for painting the USAID as a benign and non-interfering welfare organisation.

I have already encountered various people on the defensive, suggesting that what Imran said was solely in reference to the military aid. It is important to note here that Gorani specifically inquired Imran about “military and economic aid”, who then went on to bash both forms of aid in the same breath.

Personally, I have nothing against the USAID, but if you’re really against American money, look into your quarters before pointing fingers at others. Moreover, it’s not just an issue about the USAID’s decision making powers and our government’s helplessness. Only last year, the K-P government teamed up with the USAID for the establishment of the IT Skills for Youth Project. Moreover, a burn centre in Peshawar is among one of the projects the two entities have teamed up for.

In the past, the mode of action of various Pakistani politicians was to keep their wallets open and look the other way. Imran has taken it a step further – keep your wallets open and denounce the money.

And then there’s another pressing issue dealing with the topic of terrorism in Pakistan.

When asked about the way forward regarding this matter, Imran was eager to bring up the 20-point based National Action Plan (NAP), which focuses on “disarming” the militants. In fact, the said plan, devised after the brutal Army Public School (APS) incident, focuses on ways to eliminate terrorism in most of its points. What Imran clearly missed here was the fact that the glorification of terrorists will be banned if the plan is to be followed. Thus, things don’t add up if you consider that his party’s nominee for the prime ministerial slot, Sheikh Rasheed, is a man who did not condemn what Mumtaz Qadri (Salman Taseer’s murderer) did.

Now, before this turns into another one of those liberals versus conservatives debate, let me point out that Qadri was held to be a terrorist, convicted and hanged for the very same charge.

And therein lies my problem.

A person of Imran’s calibre should definitely know better than to fall back on the NAP when faced with a tough question and to ridicule the plan otherwise. Or is it the same good terrorist versus bad terrorist sub-speech he is trying to resurrect all the time? He also dismissed Zalmay Khalilzad’s allegations quite conveniently while pointing out Afghanistan’s double games. That is great, but then public enemy number one hiding in your sleepy garrison town is your responsibility more than anyone else’s.

And his lack of responsibility in such capacities is essentially what catapults Imran’s fiery response. Perhaps Imran is only carrying the legacy of trial-approved nationalism in Pakistan. Roaring in the face of the United States is as strong a factor in inciting public sentiments as was using religion or defining ourselves in comparison to India.

However, such gimmicks leave us lurking in the dark and add little to our national identity or goals. The problem with Imran’s interview is the underlying hypocrisy that is almost too palpable to ignore. There may not be any right or wrong decisions in politics, but there are at least transparent ones. It is time for Imran to adopt the latter.

It is better to go down in history as a fallen warrior than a manipulative nothing. Imran says what the people want to hear, apparently without lending much thought to his words. And this certainly is the modus operandi of many Pakistani politicians. Regardless of Imran losing credibility over the years, he still manages to maintain some of it – a perk of lousy competition perhaps.

But if it’s only the twisting of words you’re good at, without having the ability or capacity to add practical connotation to them, you should aim to be an international writer, not a national hero.

Asif Nawaz

Asif Nawaz

Asif Nawaz is a doctor from Abbottabad who's either traveling or writing while not procrastinating. He tweets as @asifnz (twitter.com/asifnz)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Jaffer Hasan

    The author does not expect IK to become Gandhi turning the other cheek to be slapped. Or does he? Crime needs to stopped and criminals punished. It is wisdom to discuss the reasons and causes in order to stop the wrong doings from happening, but once the crime is committed it must be punished to prevent repetition.Recommend

  • Israr Khan

    Asif nawaz :) what u just wrote is called manipulating truth. now lets tear ur article away.. ik was against the war on terror to start with since well 2001 -2002 and y ? because we lost 70k ppl and suffered billions of dollars in the process as well, this is what ik saw coming. now since he has not been in power and situation developed he was asked to comment on the situtation and he has been he was against the war he said we all can talk things out and this is what we should have in dec 2014 when APS happened he was so moved that he dismissed his own 126 day dharna and struggle against election rigging went on to support his forces because the forces themselves admitted even though to start with it was not their war now it is as they have come in our home and killing us, u also called him a hypocrite, hypocrisy means ‘the practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case’ that is wrong he never said he is of higher standards , he himself said start with me, hence he is simply against WRONG … his interview was in line with what COAS said that too is now owned by each and every person in parliment,Recommend

  • umar

    One of the best articles i have read in recent times. Raised all the pertinent issues and flaws in Imran Khan’s speech. He might have financial integrity and his views of making institutions strong are admirable. However, his pandering to the extremists is worrying and his supporters should put this on the weighing scale as well to decide whether to continue their support for himRecommend

  • Striver

    Whilst in noway I want to discourage them from writing as they are our next hope. However, as a basic, one needs to keep national interests in mind when expressing opinions on public forums.

    The same applies to our young film critics.

    The truth can be told in two ways. It will still remain the truth. A lie is a lie and there are no two ways about it. Therefore, I am not suggesting they lie, only that they need to frame the truth in a way that inspires positive sentiments about Pakistan. Every writer does it across the world. Why can’t we.

    Perception management starts here. This newspaper, its contributors, all have a role to play in managing the perception. That is how so many countries so often get away with murder.Recommend

  • Rahul

    Politics is about finding the mob, getting in front and leading it. The mob in Pakistan says all of Pakistan’s problems come from its enemy India, victimization by the Americans or the ingratitude of the Afghans. Pakistani’s themselves are innocent, generous and patriotic. Imran Khan is just regurgitating the national narrative.Recommend

  • PatelPara

    oh why are you even allowed to write non sense.Recommend

  • Ahmar

    He is a national treasure indeed. I suggest he should be mummified and put in the national museum after his 2018 election funeral.Recommend

  • Mohammad Ahsan Aamir

    1) Imran was fully against any military operation(except against the groups which wanted violence for personal gains)… until ‘Zarb-e-Azab’ was unleashed… after that he never opposed it by saying “I was against any such operation but now that it has begun we will support it wholeheartedly.”

    2) PTI is not in the federal government than how can it stop the USAID?… Yes, it can stop taking the portion of aid given to them in KPK but what will happen to the money that has already been taken by the federal government(it will be probably end up in the bellies of the politicians or miraculously some of it will be used in other provinces)… If the federal government is against all opposition from IK fighting as USA’s loyalist for dollars(which will not stop until the federal government asks it to) then I ask you why shouldn’t it be spent on the welfare of people?…And most of USAID’s projects in KPK are ongoing projects from the previous government!

    3) For your third question asked, I would like to remind you of IK’s opposing stance on Taseer’s killing as he was only asking “for not misusing the blasphemy law!”

    Hope that answered your questions.
    (you can google it as he was repeatedly asked such questions (on his stance on USAID & Zarb-e-Azab as well as after the Taseer’s case) in the interviews following the aforementioned incidents)Recommend

  • Noman Ansari

    Really nice blog.Recommend

  • A

    “The problem with Imran Khan’s CNN interview is his hypocrisy that is too palpable to ignore”

    And the problem with your article is that it’s too naive and immature. You do not appear to have a world view on things. Please, just stick to being a doctor. Writing isn’t for you.Recommend

  • Ahmed Raza

    The writer seems to have personal gruges with Khan. And off course he should be as most of the media houses in Pakistan are nurtured on usaid. This article is purely a political move. A movie analyst should refrain from touching political affairs as he lacks information about politics.Recommend

  • numbersnumbers

    Unfortunately I vividly recall the IK who would/could not use the words “TTP” and “TERRORISTS” in the same sentence!
    I vividly recall the IK who the TTP had picked to represent them in their “negotiations” for the government’s surrender to them!
    I recall the IK who demanded the money trail from Team Sharif in the recent past, but somehow was shy about providing his own money trail for his wealth!Recommend

  • Nauman

    Is the author just confused about the difference between CSF (Coalition Support Fund) and USAID. free advice tho, you seem to young to be writing about this stuff, why dont you blog about a trip northern areas or something of the sort.Recommend

  • UJ

    USAID (United Stated Agency for International Development) is not military aid that was disbursed to Pakistan for the failed war on terror. The author has conflated two different issues to demonize IK.Recommend

  • Saeed Khan

    Well!…
    US is the Mother of all terrorism and is a part of all the disputes existing in the world… Actually, US policies are not letting the world to live peacefully…? Where are those biological weapons on the basis of which, more than 0.5 million of innocent Iraqi people have lost their lives and the whole Iraq has been destroyed so badly that it may take it about 50 years to re_ establish? Will the author write on the killing of innocent Iraqies, Afghans, Kashmiries and Palestinians??? Will the author unveil the false propaganda of biological weapons in Iraq, which have destroyed the Iraq so badly ?
    Will the author write ever on the confess of Mr. B. Tony ( then British P.M) about the false propaganda of existence of biological weapons in Iraq? The answer is no!… Never… Americans don’t have such level of courage and honesty…
    I consider the Americans more stupid and coward creatures on the earth who are quickly getting inspired by the false propaganda spread on media by CIA and Pentagon…
    On the other hand , as far as IK narrative is concerned I personally believe he always have been very much cleared on the unending so called war on terror. If Donald J. Trump were a real patriot Pakistani, he would also have the same stance…
    Lastly, about Indians, I only would like to say that I am short of terms to express or write about their lies , dishonesty on Kashmir & water issue, RAW’s terrorism & interference in Pakistan and many other bilateral disputes…
    In the end, I would just like to suggest the dear author as well as all the most generous and the noblest creature on the Earth “The Indians” to read the Indo_Pak history of 100 years ( since 1857 to 1957), written by any impartial historian…Recommend

  • Anon

    Here’s some realpolitik for you guys who love throwing that word around – at the international arena, everyone overplays everyone else’s faults and downplays their own. It’s a PR war being played by all countries – it’s called fighting for the national interest. Because all countries interests dont converge, leaders have to play this game at the international stage. That’s why US leaders put everything on Russia and… well… pretty much everyone else in the world – China, Iran, Korea. India puts everything on Pakistan, the UK is often found blaming EU countries etc etc.

    The weird part of such criticism are the moral arguments being brought into USAID. If the Americans are building a couple of toilets in Peshawar, that doesnt suddenly put them beyond reproach! If they want to keep a limited engagement for the purposes of PR, that’s well and good and can be accepted at face value. If that suddenly escalates to acting in violation of our national interest then politicians are right to threaten to disengage – which is exactly what has happened here. It is hardly ‘hypocrisy’ of the highest order. Simply nuance!Recommend

  • Saeed Khan

    False and shameful blogRecommend

  • Anon

    Well you recall that last part completely incorrectly. He’s provided his “money trail”. If it can even be called that!
    PMLNs entire case was that a person of imran khan’s stature could never afford to buy a house!
    the total disputed amount in the Bani Gala thing came out to be effectively the price of a 1 kanal plot in Islamabad….
    Documents for which he provided!Recommend

  • muhammad saeed ahmad

    Mouth braking reply to HalaRecommend

  • Hanna Abbasi

    My IQ literally dropped reading this. I have no clue why so many leftists have an issue with Imran Khan defending the country from a fascist, misogynist called Donald Trump. Simply baffles my mind.

    Recommend

  • Hanna Abbasi

    We don’t need lectures from a country who’s Prime Minister literally won an election based around threatening Pakistan and blaming Pakistan for all its internal problems. Go away.Recommend

  • Hanna Abbasi

    “Pandering to extremists” = He’s taking votes away from ANP, quick let’s find something to discredit him.Recommend

  • Hanna Abbasi

    Who are you and what does it matter what you “vividly recall”?Recommend

  • Nauman Nobody

    First of all, no one knows how the pakistan lost $100 billion in WOT , as often claim by IK is calculated. It is a bogus number pulled out of thin air, this number used to be 60-70 billion during the toru’s-its-too-hot-for-revolution dharana days, now it is $100 billion!!!
    To put the bogus $100 billions lost by pakistan fart by IK in perspective, the entire pakistan claims that JUST $50 billion(compared to the bogus $100 billion loss claimed by IK) of chinese invest loan/investment in CPEC is going to be a game changer for pakistan!!!Recommend

  • Hanna Abbasi

    You don’t seem to have good judgement at all and you seem to have issues in understanding basic concepts of how “aid” works. Most “USAID” is not literally free aid, but rather reimbursements for services carried about on behalf of the United States…hence it’s our money to begin with.

    If you don’t understand the complexities of international politics and warfare, kindly stop commenting on it. Express Tribune is notorious for its anti-Imran Khan narrative which comes to no surprise, considering they are a branch of the New York Times.

    ET is simply an Pentagon mouthpiece…nobody takes you or this newspaper seriously.Recommend

  • Rex Minor

    IK d despite being the wrong person is still capable to use the right words for the fake news CNN. Besides, he should stop taking the role of a victim for the country.
    Rex MinorRecommend

  • Sheraz Khalid

    Just like your blogs.Recommend

  • gp65

    “Every writer does it across the world. Why can’t we.”
    No. They do not. There are so many articles written against Trump in US. Problems in Charlotteville were widely discussed and debated.
    In India, the murder of 4-5 Muslims by a mob were widely covered and condemned. Not in my name protests were held throughout IndiaRecommend

  • Hamid Azram

    I must say this is the biased article I have ever read about Imran Khan. The one person who at-least trying to defend Pakistan Internationally is accused of hypocrisy and on the other side former disqualified premier Nawaz Sharif never utter a single word to defend Pakistan and yet not a single article written on him. I think this article shows that due to the popularity of Imran Khan’s Interview on social media there are few people trying some cheap tactics, what a shameRecommend

  • Striver

    That’s fine, but you are totally off the mark here. Read the wider and deeper meaning in what I say.Recommend

  • Rex Minor

    The author should be reminded that Donald Trump is the American product in as much as IK is from the contry called Pakistan. Both have vested interest to make money, IK even deserting his own children in the care of his former wife. After Sharifs exploitations some one has to step in and IK wants it is his chance to collect the revenue of his hard sporting days.

    Rex MinorRecommend

  • Patwari

    He is also known as the Butcher of Gujrat. And has the blood of nearly 3000
    innocent Muslim men, women and children on his hands.Recommend