Can Pakistan’s president house host its Ahmadi citizens on an Eid celebration?

Published: July 26, 2016
Email

There are over three million (1% of the United States population) Muslims living in America. Even though anti-Muslim animus is generally on the rise across the country, President Obama has increasingly stood up for the Muslim American community. He has passionately promoted pluralism and diversity in the United States and vouches for religious tolerance world over.

In his latest show of solidarity and outreach, the president held a White House reception to celebrate Eidul Fitr with Muslim American leaders and activists.

Muslims from all sects came together to celebrate one of Islam’s holiest days in one of the nation’s most significant landmarks. This was a feat of unity and pluralism that is rarely seen even within the Muslim community.

A Muslim woman opened the event with the recitation of the Holy Quran. When it was time for Asar prayer, another Muslim man – Mr Qasim Rashid said the Azaan (call to prayer) in the White House. Mr Rashid is a spokesperson of the Ahmadiyya Community USA. He is a human rights attorney and award-winning author of three books, including The Wrong Kind of Muslim. Under the viral video of him saying the Azaan, he wrote:

“In my adopted nation of America, I am a full citizen with full rights and full religious freedom. So much so that I can proclaim the Islamic call to prayer from the White House itself, and do so without fear. Instead, a special prayer room was provided for me to pray as I wish. I considered it a distinct honour and privilege that I could fully practice my faith as a Muslim in the very centre of our nation’s capital.”

In Pakistan, many from the right wing majority attribute anti-Muslim bigotry to the White House. There is no doubt that Islamophobia is on the rise in America. With Trump’s rise, it has sadly become more mainstream. His ignorant claims that over a quarter of Muslim Americans are pro-terrorist, that Muslims are not loyal to the country, and his bigoted suggestions that they be forced to wear special identification badges and banned from immigration have emboldened an extremist fringe. But despite all of this, the American state continues to provide complete religious liberty to its Muslim citizens and refuses to be a party to the hate fest.

Sadly, this is not the case back home in Pakistan where the state is an eager party to such religious bigotry by our own ‘Trumps’ (and we have no shortage of them). Under Pakistan’s notorious Ordinance XX, issued by General Zia in 1984, Pakistan severely restricts the religious liberties of its Ahmadi citizens. They can be jailed for three years for ‘posing as Muslim,’ a ‘crime’ that the law claims ‘hurts the sentiments of Pakistan’s Muslims’. Ahmadis cannot self-identify as Muslims. And hundreds of Ahmadis have been jailed for reciting the Kalima, reading the Holy Quran, saying the Salam, saying the Azaan, caught praying etc. Just recently, two elderly Ahmadis, one in his 80s, were jailed for printing a verse of the Holy Quran and selling a copy of it to another Ahmadi respectively.

I am an American Muslim myself. And in America, every Muslim is granted equal rights by the state, and every Muslim is an equal victim to Islamophobia. Muslim places of worship have equally been targeted and defiled in recent years. The difference in Pakistan is that instead of countering this phobia against a religious minority, the state is a willing party to it. Instead of condemning the calls for bans and special identifications, the state enforces this discrimination.

Can Pakistan’s president house, for example, host its Ahmadi citizens (alongside other Muslims) on an Eid celebration? Can Pakistan’s prime minister visit an Ahmadi place of worship in the country, let alone refer to it as a mosque? Can Pakistan’s political leadership stand up to the rampant anti-Ahmadi bigotry in society and publicly embrace Pakistan’s Ahmadi citizens?

We complain of the rise of Trump in the United States, but fail to realise that the mullaism in our midst is not only far more putrid, it is celebrated by law and enshrined in the constitution.

What this White House Eid celebration should teach us is that the state must always celebrate diversity and pluralism and we can always agree to disagree on faith matters while standing up for the basic human dignity and freedoms of one another.

And to those on social media expressing anger at President Obama inviting Ahmadis alongside other Muslims, your counterparts in America are also angry he invited Muslims alongside people of other faiths. Look yourselves in the mirror and dye that orange hair.

kashif.chaudhry

Kashif Chaudhry

A graduate of King Edward Medical University, Lahore and Mt Sinai University Hospital in New York, Kashif is currently completing his Cardiology fellowship in Boston, USA. He writes for various American newspapers and Pakistani publications and blogs at the Huffington Post. His interests include medicine, human rights and interfaith dialogue. He tweets @KashifMD (twitter.com/KashifMD)

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Gp65

    Final prophethood of Mohammed is not one of the 5 pillars of Islam, though Allah being the only God is part of Kalima which is one of the 5 pillars of Islam.Recommend

  • Gp65

    Please provide reference to any Quran Aayat which says that Mohammed is the last prophet.
    Your statement that something is inviolate does not make it so.Recommend

  • Gp65

    Yes and that civilized world includes India. Ironically, Ahmadis chose to fight. For partition of India saying that they could not live with Hindus.Recommend

  • AA_Southpaw

    Please reply.Recommend

  • AA_Southpaw

    I’m waiting for the reply Kashif.Recommend

  • Miyagi Jr.

    Yes, Muslims cannot live with Hindus and vice versa in the current circumstances, but you got the theory all wrong.
    Together they do live and work peacefully outside the subcontinent, why is that? because of Justice and freedom of religion and expression.

    Extremist wings on both ends who doesn’t want peace, who lynch people for beef and blasphemy. That is why extremist mullahs and Hindus were both against Jinnah. Ahmadis were for absolute justice and freedom of religion.

    Peace.Recommend

  • Miyagi Jr.

    And when the ignorant address you, say peace and move on.

    PeaceRecommend

  • Salim Alvi

    ElaborateRecommend

  • Salim Alvi

    In every village where Muslims are in miniscule minority they live peacefully and thrive. All those bollywoody khans thrive bashing India. Why are they not going to Pakistan?Recommend

  • gp65

    Ahmadis can pray in a mosque in India and call themselves Muslims – which they believe they are. That is called freedom of worship.
    In India ANYONE of any faith can become President, PM, CJ of Supreme Court, COAS and India has had non-Hindu President, PM, CJ of Supreme Court and COAS. In Pakistan all these things are not permitted by law.
    The Ahmadis have the same voting rights as any Hindu or atheist. You should check the voting rights of non-Muslims in Pakistan especially if they do not live in a geography which has a reserved seat.
    Secularism is about equal before law. In India this is true for everything except personal law where people are governed by personal law of religion they practice.Recommend

  • gp65

    Please be aware that Ahmadis can call themselves Ahmadis and worship in a mosque. They have greater rights to worship in India than ANY Sunni majority country in the world including Pakistan.
    You talk about freedom of expression. In Pakistan you cannot even greet someone by saying Salaam Aleikum. In India you can.
    Please do not defend the decision to support TNT and then pretend that Ahmadis believe in living in harmony with everyone.Recommend

  • Ali Khan

    Ahmadis are NOT Muslims as per the Pakistani law. Period.Recommend