Can Pakistan’s president house host its Ahmadi citizens on an Eid celebration?

Published: July 26, 2016

There are over three million (1% of the United States population) Muslims living in America. Even though anti-Muslim animus is generally on the rise across the country, President Obama has increasingly stood up for the Muslim American community. He has passionately promoted pluralism and diversity in the United States and vouches for religious tolerance world over.

In his latest show of solidarity and outreach, the president held a White House reception to celebrate Eidul Fitr with Muslim American leaders and activists.

Muslims from all sects came together to celebrate one of Islam’s holiest days in one of the nation’s most significant landmarks. This was a feat of unity and pluralism that is rarely seen even within the Muslim community.

A Muslim woman opened the event with the recitation of the Holy Quran. When it was time for Asar prayer, another Muslim man – Mr Qasim Rashid said the Azaan (call to prayer) in the White House. Mr Rashid is a spokesperson of the Ahmadiyya Community USA. He is a human rights attorney and award-winning author of three books, including The Wrong Kind of Muslim. Under the viral video of him saying the Azaan, he wrote:

“In my adopted nation of America, I am a full citizen with full rights and full religious freedom. So much so that I can proclaim the Islamic call to prayer from the White House itself, and do so without fear. Instead, a special prayer room was provided for me to pray as I wish. I considered it a distinct honour and privilege that I could fully practice my faith as a Muslim in the very centre of our nation’s capital.”

In Pakistan, many from the right wing majority attribute anti-Muslim bigotry to the White House. There is no doubt that Islamophobia is on the rise in America. With Trump’s rise, it has sadly become more mainstream. His ignorant claims that over a quarter of Muslim Americans are pro-terrorist, that Muslims are not loyal to the country, and his bigoted suggestions that they be forced to wear special identification badges and banned from immigration have emboldened an extremist fringe. But despite all of this, the American state continues to provide complete religious liberty to its Muslim citizens and refuses to be a party to the hate fest.

Sadly, this is not the case back home in Pakistan where the state is an eager party to such religious bigotry by our own ‘Trumps’ (and we have no shortage of them). Under Pakistan’s notorious Ordinance XX, issued by General Zia in 1984, Pakistan severely restricts the religious liberties of its Ahmadi citizens. They can be jailed for three years for ‘posing as Muslim,’ a ‘crime’ that the law claims ‘hurts the sentiments of Pakistan’s Muslims’. Ahmadis cannot self-identify as Muslims. And hundreds of Ahmadis have been jailed for reciting the Kalima, reading the Holy Quran, saying the Salam, saying the Azaan, caught praying etc. Just recently, two elderly Ahmadis, one in his 80s, were jailed for printing a verse of the Holy Quran and selling a copy of it to another Ahmadi respectively.

I am an American Muslim myself. And in America, every Muslim is granted equal rights by the state, and every Muslim is an equal victim to Islamophobia. Muslim places of worship have equally been targeted and defiled in recent years. The difference in Pakistan is that instead of countering this phobia against a religious minority, the state is a willing party to it. Instead of condemning the calls for bans and special identifications, the state enforces this discrimination.

Can Pakistan’s president house, for example, host its Ahmadi citizens (alongside other Muslims) on an Eid celebration? Can Pakistan’s prime minister visit an Ahmadi place of worship in the country, let alone refer to it as a mosque? Can Pakistan’s political leadership stand up to the rampant anti-Ahmadi bigotry in society and publicly embrace Pakistan’s Ahmadi citizens?

We complain of the rise of Trump in the United States, but fail to realise that the mullaism in our midst is not only far more putrid, it is celebrated by law and enshrined in the constitution.

What this White House Eid celebration should teach us is that the state must always celebrate diversity and pluralism and we can always agree to disagree on faith matters while standing up for the basic human dignity and freedoms of one another.

And to those on social media expressing anger at President Obama inviting Ahmadis alongside other Muslims, your counterparts in America are also angry he invited Muslims alongside people of other faiths. Look yourselves in the mirror and dye that orange hair.


Kashif Chaudhry

A graduate of King Edward Medical University, Lahore and Mt Sinai University Hospital in New York, Kashif is currently completing his Cardiology fellowship in Boston, USA. He writes for various American newspapers and Pakistani publications and blogs at the Huffington Post. His interests include medicine, human rights and interfaith dialogue. He tweets @KashifMD (

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • wb

    On a lighter, but very apt, timely and pertinent note:

    Do you know how the following saying goes? Recommend

  • salim

    Ahmadis were part of the groups of sects which were leading bigots when it came to partition time. Can’t live with Hindus and breathe the same air and water, huh? Karma is a …….Recommend

  • Fawda

    Ahmadi was jailed for selling and reading Quran, but even any shipowner Hindu-Christian can sell it and nobody is banned from reading it, anywhere. Actually it is good that more and more people read or distribute it, why Ahmadis were jailed for doing that?? It seems that it is just to punish Ahmadis.Recommend

  • Naveed

    They do not believe in finality of Prophethood, is not so what.
    They cannot disguise themselves between Muslims and not fulfill the Basics. Why don’t they Call then Only Ahmedis….Recommend

  • Naveed

    The Writer is Ahmadi himself..Recommend

  • AnisAqeel

    Is that so?Recommend

  • Milind A

    ” there are significant disputes between the various Hindu groups”

    Few things
    1. these disputes are not as bad as those amongst Muslim sects, where people are blown up, beheaded or killed
    2. People are showing an inclination to come out of this bias as awareness & education increases
    3. Hinduism is dynamic and being steadily reformed. Reformers are not declared ‘un-Hindu’ and killed
    4. Finally the discrimination is not supported constitutionally as in Muslim countries.Recommend

  • Milind A

    defenseless?? She could be a burqa wearing suicide bomber.. But I guess its ok to shoot Muslims in Pakistan by the army.. but the moment a Muslim is roughed up, its an issue. Get a life!!1Recommend

  • Shehryar Hassan

    I don’t understand….why the ahmedis/qadianis are hell bent on proving themselves muslims!……….If you have chosen a new Prophet; then live with a new identity……..Live your life, follow your religion but without the disguise of Islam………..Recommend


    Pakistan Constitution declares Ahmadis non muslim. The ahmadi author is purporting to represent him as a muslimRecommend

  • Kushal

    So are Pakistanis. Aren’t they?Recommend

  • Kushal

    His first law minister was a Hindu as well. You know his fate right?Recommend

  • Kashif Chaudhry

    Interesting to see Pakistani Mullahs and Indian Hindutva trolls join hands in justifying persecution of Ahmadi Muslims. Cool story!Recommend

  • Kashif Chaudhry

    Many Indians justifying #AhmadiApartheid. Glad I could bring Pakistani and Indian Mullahs finally on the same page.Recommend

  • Kashif Chaudhry

    If Donald trump’s constitution labels Muslims terrorists, will you accept it? Constitutions are man made. Here is what Islam and Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) say about who a Muslim is.

  • Kashif Chaudhry

    Our Prophet is Rasulullah Khataman Nabiyeen Muhammad Mustafa (pbuh). And his verdict is what we shall follow. Not yours or your Mullahs’. Read his words:

  • Kashif Chaudhry
  • AA_Southpaw

    Please reply.Recommend

  • AA_Southpaw

    I’m waiting for the reply Kashif.Recommend

  • Miyagi Jr.

    Yes, Muslims cannot live with Hindus and vice versa in the current circumstances, but you got the theory all wrong.
    Together they do live and work peacefully outside the subcontinent, why is that? because of Justice and freedom of religion and expression.

    Extremist wings on both ends who doesn’t want peace, who lynch people for beef and blasphemy. That is why extremist mullahs and Hindus were both against Jinnah. Ahmadis were for absolute justice and freedom of religion.


  • Miyagi Jr.

    And when the ignorant address you, say peace and move on.


  • Salim Alvi


  • Salim Alvi

    In every village where Muslims are in miniscule minority they live peacefully and thrive. All those bollywoody khans thrive bashing India. Why are they not going to Pakistan?Recommend