So we can watch LGBT porn, but not support the community?

Growing up in Pakistan, it’s impossible to not come across the Pakhtun and homosexuality stereotype.

Salman Zafar April 28, 2016
The editor of an LGBT magazine in Bangladesh was hacked to death two days ago. This is not the first time that something of this nature has happened, and neither will it be the last.

Tracing back as far as ancient Greece, up until Christianity became the official religion of the Roman Empire, same-sex unions have existed in some form or the other. The Church was obligated to be critical of non-procreative unions and this began to be seen as deviant behaviour. Soon after, same sex unions became socially and legally unacceptable.

However, times have changed as well as our mentality. Scandinavian countries took the first step, with Denmark, Norway and Sweden legalising same-sex unions in 19891993 and 1994 respectively.

That being said, opposition to homosexuality continues to exist even in countries that have legalised same-sex marriages. Their arguments incorporate religious concerns. Not only that, they strongly believe that homosexuality defies the law of nature and is capable of ruining traditional marriages and tacitly condones polygamy, etc. It seems as though their list of arguments continues to grow along with their distaste.

But despite opposition, acceptance for homosexuality is becoming more common by the day. In countries that have legalised marriage, it is easy to use official records to keep track of how acceptable and common such unions are. Where the other 150 countries are concerned, it is very difficult for their community. One major reason is the disturbing homophobic attitude towards same-sex couples in most of these countries.

Let’s take a look at Pakistan – tons of ethnic slurs have become a permanent part of Pakistani society, but there is none more common than that of the homosexual Pakhtun. This slur has been around for what seems like an eternity and illuminates two disturbing features of Pakistani mentality: the generalisation of an entire ethnicity based on racial nonsense passed on from generation to generation (the Sindhi thief, the ugly Bengali etc). That, and sex jokes that mock homosexuality.

Growing up in Pakistan, it’s impossible to not come across the Pakhtun and homosexuality stereotype, such is its tragic strength in our public and private debates. Here, it is impossible to defend homosexuality as a private matter between two individuals when the natural order of life and religion is thrown into the middle to end all arguments. The story of Qaum e Lut (People of Prophet Lut) is a favourite reference point for everyone pounding their Islamic chests and flying the flag of God’s wrath and eternal damnation sky high.

While these homophobic reactions are natural from religious people, it’s surprising that the not-so-religious lot share the stance. While discussions with them to not involve stories of Qaum e Lut being told like Shakespearean tragedies, their arguments are horrifically simple – “it is disgusting.”

How someone else’s sexual preference disgusts them is the confusing part here.

This hatred was excessively evident on social media, the centre stage of people shooting from the hip (not a play on words, my dear homophobic friends). Facebook and Twitter had been abuzz with people expressing support for same-sex relations with various annual pride parades taking place globally some time back. However, on the opposite and sadly much heavier side of the coin, the homophobic attitude was expressed in the most spectacular of manners, exemplified by not only the regular everyday Pakistani Facebook user, but also by celebrities like Hamza Ali Abbasi.

Hamza Ali Abbasi's stance on gay marriage being legalisedPhoto: Express Tribune

The most disappointing aspect is that these homophobic tirades were instigated by educated Pakistanis; these people have traveled the world and have been exposed to different cultures. The people who want to see this country prosper are the same people who are preaching narrow-mindedness towards trivial matters (and one that’s ultimately a personal choice). They are shredding every notion of tolerance for the fellow man into a billion unrecognisable pieces.

Nadeem Farooq Paracha's views on the Pakistani community living abroadPhoto: Facebook

This whole situation is a sad reminder of where we stand as a society. It is a reminder of how far into the future we need to travel to stretch open the horrifically narrow minds we carry.
WRITTEN BY:
Salman Zafar

The writer works in the Education Sector and tweets as https://twitter.com/salmanzafar1985">@salmanzafar1985

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (61)

Hunter | 7 years ago | Reply This is where you can Clearly see the Line Drawn B/w Modernism and Westernism. This is where the lines should be drawn I will not accept it nor will I Make someone feel bad about doing such stuff in Real Life or Expose them But I will not Endorse it This Stuff won't go away so I am just gonna place in the dark corner of thing that I had rather not talk about And Do what I can do best. That is tolerate them
Alter Ego | 7 years ago | Reply You might not be aware but nowadays almost anyone can put up a website and write whatever they want to write on it. A point ruthlessly exploited by Axact to prove their "universities" and "professors" existed. There is no censor. You pointing me to a website proves , what ? I can point you to websites that claims that we are brains in a vat linked by wires and other such nonsense.. It doesn't make it the truth.
Laskero | 7 years ago You might not be aware that both Mother Jones and Pew Research are credible sources. If you have any credible sources to refute their research, please share with us all.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ