Bangladesh whitewashes Pakistan – Was it Azhar Ali’s fault?

Published: April 23, 2015

Pakistan cricketers congatulate teamate Junaid Khan (3R) after the dismissal of Bangladesh cricketer Soumya Sarkar during the second One Day International cricket match between Bangladesh and Pakistan at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium in Dhaka on April 19, 2015. PHOTO: AFP

Bangladesh cricketer Tamim Iqbal plays a shot during the second One Day International cricket match between Bangladesh and Pakistan at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium in Dhaka on April 19, 2015. PHOTO: AFP Pakistan cricketers congatulate teamate Junaid Khan (3R) after the dismissal of Bangladesh cricketer Soumya Sarkar during the second One Day International cricket match between Bangladesh and Pakistan at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium in Dhaka on April 19, 2015. PHOTO: AFP

Bangladesh has waited for nearly 16 years to achieve its second victory against Pakistan in an ODI, but it took them a week to completely whitewash Pakistan. Pakistan’s defeat against Bangladesh is surprising, but for me, the biggest surprise is the ease with which Bangladesh beat Pakistan in all three ODI matches.

Photo: AFP

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and the tour selection committee was supposed to select the 11 best players for our national team, but looking at the team that went for the tour, it seems as if PCB has no idea who our best 11 players are, or what makes up a good team.

The bowling

In this tournament, Pakistan faced the same dilemma as it did during the ICC World Cup 2015. Throughout the World Cup, analysts were advocating for the inclusion of our leg spinner, Yasir Shah, but our management showed a lot of reluctance, stating that conditions are not favourable for spinners – even though spinners from other teams were enjoying reasonable success during the tournament.

Shah was given one chance to showcase his talents, but it was unfortunately against India – which is known to be pretty good at batting against spinners.

Photo: AFP

Coming back to the Bangladesh series, our team selection remains questionable. Bangladesh pitches boast of spin-friendly conditions, but even then, the team management has remained adamant on not allowing two of our spinners to play. Maybe Waqar Younis and the rest are a bit uncomfortable with spinners and don’t know how to utilise them. However, this does not justify benching them, especially for such crucial matches.

Out with the old, in with the new?

Pakistan included two new players in the first two matches of the series – Mohammad Rizwan and Saad Nasim – but they left out Sami Aslam (who is often dubbed as the future of Pakistani cricket) for some odd reason. Had he been allowed to join in the first two matches, he could have played well and scored a century maybe and that would have helped Pakistan win at least one match, if not all of them.

Even though he did get a chance to make his debut in the third ODI, where he played with confidence and showcased his tremendous capabilities, there was nothing much that he could do. Other players seemed to have lost their ability to play cricket; Azhar Ali kept playing a lot of dot balls at the other end of the pitch, hampering Aslam’s fluency, due to which he failed to get a big score.

Photo: AFP

Playing too many dot balls is a major problem for the Pakistan cricket team; they lack the art of manoeuvring the ball. Our players have two gears – they either hit the ball or they block it. Pakistan played a total of 1129 dot balls during the World Cup. The same seemed to be the case in the Bangladesh series. By scoring singles, players can move the scoreboard forward and also minimise the pressure exerted by opposition, but we rarely seem to follow that tactic.

In the second ODI, Nasim and Harris Sohail built a good partnership to revive Pakistan, but they struggled to score regular singles.

Photo: AFP

During this series, the debutants, Nasim, Rizwan and Aslam, exhibited their talent to prove a point – that no matter what, Pakistan is a talent-filled country and all we need are the right people at the helm to spot unique individuals and groom them into world class cricketers.

Although Rizwan played well in the first ODI, I disagree with the team management to groom an additional wicket keeper-cum-batsman when Sarfraz Ahmed is already available to do the job. By dropping Sarfraz in the third ODI match, it seems that PCB has tried to shatter his confidence yet again.

Such political manoeuvres often lead to professional suicide in cricket – something which PCB needs to keep in mind.

Photo: AFP

Our team has witnessed countless inconsistent performances by cricketers, yet they are allowed to play in each and every match, but when it comes to Sarfraz, he tops the list of unlucky players since he was immediately dropped from the team just after a couple of sub-par performances.

I wish our team could put Sarfraz’s talents to good use.

While the success of our newcomers is a positive sign, it is the constant failure of our seniors that poses to be a serious problem. Cricket teams around the world are led by experienced players, but in Pakistan, it is the complete opposite. Senior players, as well as newcomers lack consistency – a case in point is the dismal performances given by Mohammad Hafeez and Fawad Alam during this tournament.

The cricket board needs to sit with our senior players and make it clear to them that either they perform consistently or they stop playing completely. They really need to get their act together.

Photo: AFP

The batting

Moving on to our batting issues, while Haris Sohail seems to be a good option to lead our batting attack, it seems that he is constantly struggling to get past an average score of 30s and 40s. He needs to overcome this problem immediately and start converting his mediocre innings into mammoth innings, which will not only benefit him but the team as well.

Photo: AFP

Pakistan’s problem against left-arm spinners is also getting worse. In Sri Lanka, we struggled against Rangana Herath and in Bangladesh, Shakib al Hasan and Arafat Sunny proved to be problematic for our team. Our players need to work hard and learn on how to bat against left-arm spinners, particularly the likes of Hasan.

Photo: AFP

Bangladesh is a completely different team in their home ground – they showed this during the 2012 Asia Cup when they beat India and Sri Lanka and nearly beat Pakistan in the finals. Previously, they managed to beat New Zealand and West Indies in their home ground as well.

A disappointing captain

I feel that our new captain has been a disappointing captain so far. Azhar’s  inexperience was highlighted when he introduced our fifth bowler at the wrong time during the Bangladesh innings during the first ODI. He committed another blunder in the second ODI by setting a spread-out field rather than a defensive one, knowing very well we had a low score to defend.

Pakistan’s domestic cricket is extremely weak; it has failed to produce a decent leader and a captain who is well-versed with the art of leading at international and national levels. The domestic structure of some teams is so strong that they automatically get well-bred leaders.

Lee Kenneth Germon, from the New Zealand team, was selected from the domestic structure based on his leadership and management skills. He made his Test debut as a captain against Pakistan in 1996. George Bailey is a recent example; he was named the Australian T20 captain in 2011 and 2012 purely because of the leadership skills he showed at domestic level.

But we cannot blame our cricket entirely.

As the head coach, Younis is also responsible for our team’s defeat. He cannot absolve himself of his responsibilities by giving statements about players’ fitness levels and attitude issues. It is his responsibility to improve the players if they are facing these problems, and if he is unable to fulfil this responsibility, he should be replaced by someone who has better management and coping skills.

Even though Pakistan lost the ODI series, I hope PCB sees this as a mistake to learn from. In the future, I hope our management shows signs of prudence in its team selection, continue its rebuilding process, and resist the demands of calling back the oldies who have failed us repeatedly.

Photo: AFP

If Pakistan wants to regain its lost glory, we need to restructure our domestic cricket system, reduce the number of international matches drastically and make domestic cricket more competitive. It is the quality of matches that matters, not the quantity. I hope those running PCB are able appropriate steps to put Pakistani cricket back on its path to success.

Khurram Zia Khan

Khurram Zia Khan

The writer is the media manager of Asiatic Public Relations and tweets @KhurramZiaKhan (

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Irum Mashood

    Agree with all !! Hats off to your knowledge and command over the topic !
    I wonder what are these new academies of cricket up to…For instance Moin Khan Academy and lots of others charging handsome amount for teaching cricket and soccer to the young boys we hardly see any talent rising from there …..Recommend

  • kaamAdmi

    0 comments is good new since minus is not possible. Such good experts are wasted in Pakistan. Sir please come over to India and hoot PakistanRecommend

  • Temur

    {{{If Pakistan wants to regain its lost glory, we need to restructure our domestic cricket system, reduce the number of international matches drastically and make domestic cricket more competitive.}}}

    “We need to restructure our domestic cricket system.” How many times have we heard it before? Do you remember? Do you? Remember? (thank you N. Paracha)
    I would have never sent this team to Bangladesh as it was clear right from the beginning that this team would lose. I am not saying that I knew that we would lose all three ODIs but I was sure that this time the chances of losing a couple of matches were high. PCB is a very unprofessional club comprised of nominated lackeys. I have lost every interest in cricket due to the unprofessional attitude of these people. I don’t know what a full time journalist has got to offer to our cricket? He is making money and we are being humiliated.Recommend

  • Khalid

    This is so typical of Pakistanis blaming Azhar Ali for the loss, Azhar Ali defied everyones expectations by proving to be a revelation with the bat, not only did he become the first Pakistani captain to score an ODI hundred in 5 years but he was Pakistans most prolific batsman throughout the series. You say he consumed a lot of dot balls and destroyed fluency of Aslams batting, lol. Aslam played well but got out due to his own fault, you cant blame Azhar for his dismissal. Azhar Ali’s strike rate btw was 85 in the series his average was 70 even if he consumes alot of dot balls it is evident that he makes up for them later in his innings. As for the ‘blunder’ in the first ODI what can you expect when you are playing 4 specialist bowlers? He had to introduce someone else to preserve the other bowler’s overs. The fact of the matter is that Pakistan lost the series due to their bowling, plain and simple. Pakistan scored an aggregate of 731 runs for the loss of 26 wickets while Bangladesh scored 836 runs for the loss of 11 wickets. This is Misbah all over again, Yes, there are problems in our team but we shouldnt be pointing at the wrong people. Azhar on the contrary was Pakistans silver-lining in this series and will make a great captain in the future if he is given the right supportRecommend

  • critic

    azher ali scored 100 at a striker rate of 90 and you call it slow??i think azher has turned into a gud odi player but i think the right position for him must be 1 down while ahmed shehzad and sami aslam openers …while for your information yasir shah got injured in the practice match and was ruled out of the series..Recommend

  • Adnan

    Yasir shah is inured …Recommend

  • kaamAdmi

    Irum Mashood either get your data on Ahmed Shehzads ratio of Dot Balls v/s Azhar’s or stop flattering. Also see the confusion of Mr khurram on whether he wants to criticize tactics of azhar as captain or his batting? which actually is much better than the rest. What more, he wants to kill two birds with a single stone by criticizing Waqar in the same breath. He may not have watched as many matches as Waqar has played. No body who spits on sky can escape the ultimate “God help Asiatic Public Relations”Recommend

  • aq13

    poor article!Recommend

  • Saad

    Does Mr. Khurram ZIa even know about Cricket? Pathetic Article! Recommend

  • The Guest Star

    What i can conclude from this article is that Mr. Zia has seen a bare minimum of this series since he doesnt even know that Yasir Shah is injured and him criticising Azhar shows that he didnt see him bat at all, Azhar has been striking at 85 in this series, in the first game he had a S.R of 98. Im sorry but i must say this is a really poor article and your lack of knowledge about the game makes it worseRecommend

  • Khurram Zia Khan

    I think you need to read article again, I know Yasir shah is unfit, I discussed about him in context of World Cup. Azhar Ali have a good Strike rate,but as captain he need to take responsibility,twice he got out playing poor shots after making healthy contribution. A batsman when set should take team to position of strength and not get out.Recommend