Perhaps Pakistan can learn from Austria’s madrassas

Published: March 1, 2015
SHARES
Email

The government would have to end the direct foreign funding, and instead a streamlined mechanism would have to be introduced, so that all the money flows through the government’s hands.

A year before a mosque in Kanpur (pre-partition India) was razed by our British overlords to pave way for a road, and while a Jinnah-less Muslim League was yet to overhaul its objectives – which until then asserted that ‘the party shall work towards manifesting a sense of loyalty to Britain’ – to work towards creation of a Muslim majority state (Pakistan was still a very distant idea), Austria passed a remarkably inclusive law, setting an example for the rest of the European countries.

In 1912, Habsburg Emperor Franz Joseph passed an act guaranteeing its small minority of Muslims royal patronage by making Islam the state religion. Not Sunni Islam, Not Shia Islam, but Islam.

More than a century later, the country was compelled into passing an amendment to the above law, thereby making any foreign funding to the madrassas and imams in the country illegal. Sebastian Kurz, the integration minister of Austria, stated that the step was taken to “prevent certain Muslim countries from using financial means to exert political influence”, and to “give Islam the chance to develop freely within the society in line with the common European values”.

Pakistan is no alien to the phenomenon Kurz yearns to save Austria from. Had the country’s religion been allowed to develop according to the sub-continental leanings, the Sufism-inspired Islam was as inclusive in its outlook and as inclined towards peace and humanity as Buddhism. Love was the only principle it sought to defend – love and acceptance.

It was in this spirit of Sufi Islam that Allama Iqbal had written,

Banda-e-ishq az khuda geerad tareeq;

Me-shavad ber kafir o momin shafeeq;

Kufr o deen ra geer dar pehnae dil;

Dil agar bi-gurezad az dil, wae dil

(The person of love seeks his path from God,

(And thus) becomes kind towards both an infidel and a believer.

Give Islam and the non-Islamic religions space in your heart (simultaneously),

(For) pitiable is the heart that evades another heart.)

Retrograding from that to today, the country has become a virtual warzone for the proxy war being fought between Saudi Arabia and Iran, with sectarianism on a continuous, precipitous rise. Mosque after mosque is witnessing attacks, and one imam after another is being shot down, owing to the difference in interpretations of the teachings. Ulema within our state are the most ignorant and bigoted creed, evident from our failure to come to a compromise on the day that Eid should be celebrated.

Together with this exist clerics like Maulana Abdul Aziz, who openly admitted,

“There is no sanctity of the [Pakistani] Constitution for us.”

And on being inquired as to why there is a presence of weapons at the madrassa, he stated,

“Since there is the principle of jihad in our Islam, so we think that there should be real weapons in homes”.

In the same interview conducted by Sohail Warraich, the cleric also acknowledged that the monthly payroll of the staff working under his supervision is around Rs2.7 to 2.8 million, and that he has only one bank account, that in Dubai – a fine indication of where the funding for the madrassa is happening from.

Despite being expelled from a government job as a mufti, the cleric continues to occupy Lal Masjid, which supposedly is under the supervision of the Auqaf Department.

Then there are educational boards like Wifaqul Madaris al Arabia, which due to its very name should ring danger bells, with more than 19,000 madrassas associated with it, and a total student strength exceeding 2.3 million pupils according to its own website.

This educational board is ostensibly non-political, although from time to time, it puts its weight behind leaders like Maulana Fazlur Rehman. It claims to speak for harmony within various sects, but one look at its official Facebook page and one would notice post after post demanding justice for the victims of the Raja Bazar Mosque attack in Rawalpindi – victims were from Sunni (Deoband) school of thought – yet not a single request for the same to be provided to various attacks on different imambargahs (victims aligned to the Shia sect).

From the other side of the divide, banned organisations like Sipah-e-Muhammad, and the madrassas associated with them, continue to sow the seeds of sectarianism. Raja Umar Khattab of the counter terrorism unit has claimed on record that the militants associated with the organisation were trained, and the funding for the organisation comes from Iran.

If Pakistan is indeed sincere in its quest to provide a future to its children, one which is not bloodied by warfare, it would have to take a leaf out of Austria’s book. The continuous trickle of money into the system which then ends up devouring the lives of peace-deprived Pakistanis cannot be allowed to continue.

Mere lip service would never achieve that target.

The government would have to end the direct foreign funding, and instead a streamlined mechanism would have to be introduced, so that all the money flows through the government’s hands. It can then lead to better accountability of the purpose the money is being utilised for, and a greater government control over what should be taught at the seminaries. The government would be able to ensure that any madrassa that is involved in anti-state activities, or contributing towards perpetuation of sectarianism, is monetarily asphyxiated.

In our eagerness to play the bastion of Islam, we have allowed all forms of radicalism and militancy to creep in. It is time, now, to look homewards towards putting our own house in order, and a return to a more inclusive, peaceful form of religion.

Badar Chaudhary

Badar Chaudhary

An engineering graduate from Cardiff University, Britain, Badar tweets as @badarchaudhary

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Maximus Decimus Meridius

    Through the governments hands is like making the cat guard the milk. Saudis own the sharifs. We should stop all foreign funding. Streamline the syllabus of these madrassas , throw out the books preaching extremism, jail the teachers teaching extremism and close the ones with ties to extremists. 90% of the ” teachers ” abuse their students, both physically and sexually. These teachers are usually illiterate when it comes to modern education. They have extremist views and they think that what they have is the truth. All others should b be killed. Until and unless this cancer is removed you cannot just regulate the funding to control the extremist madrassa culture.
    For those who think that madrassa culture helps students. Please inquire from any shop close to the madrassa. The biggest sale of contraceptives is to madrassa. They also buy large amounts of sleeping pills and first aid. I myself inquired this from 24 shops in idol Islamabad, Rawalpindi and wah area. Feel free to do so. So madrassa culture is at the present moment very bad for everything and needs to be changed. And if the government is too callus, sycophantic and sick that they cannot change this, then they should ban all madrassas. Better for children to stay with their families in poverty than to be fed and raped in these hell holes.Recommend

  • Milind A

    “In 1912, Habsburg Emperor Franz Joseph passed an act guaranteeing its small minority of Muslims royal patronage by making Islam the state religion.”

    As usual Muslims misused this patronage, causing Austria to pass a new law, prohibiting the use of Korans in any language except German

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/26/austria-law-on-islam_n_6754012.html?ir=IndiaRecommend

  • Karwa sach

    Who is finding you buddy?Recommend

  • Ibaad

    If we are any serious about constitutional democracy, then our laws can not be reactionary or discriminatory. We can not allow foreign funding for secular education and ban such funding for religious education. How do you define political or apolitical? Every funding from the likes of USAID or AgFed are meant for the promotion of certain ideologies easily construable for as political goals.

    You starting off advocating only Islam, instead of any of its brands and then moved on to advocating for a certain brand: a moderate enlightened all-inclusive sufi version. That’s self contradictory.

    State has no business in moral or religious policing. It should promote a certain brand of Islam or hinder the blossoming of another. It just needs to fulfill its basic responsibilities better – chiefly the protection of the lives of its citizens and prosecuting and punishing those who engage in criminal activities, be it for religious glory or secular motives.Recommend

  • Maximus Decimus Meridius

    What a pathetic excuse for such atrocities. Your statement is self contradictory. If the state wants to preserve the lives of its subjects then it NEEDS TO STOP MADRASSA CULTURE. This is not about any promotion or other ideological stance. Madrassa culture is killing, abusing and harming our children and our adults. They need to be stopped. Just when did US AID include killing in its “ideology” ? On the other hand the Saudis are funding the killing of millions.
    To be frank your ilk is the very reason we are such a backward society. And your kind needs to be stopped. Thank God there are people like Mr jibran who are now trying to set you straight. I wish more and more Pakistani intellectuals stay in Pakistan and fight against your demented and deluded mindset. It is high time we stopped running away from your kind who think that they can justify funding of terror and abuse. Recommend

  • Asim

    He said inclusive. Not moderate and certainly not enlightened. You probably need to read the article again to get to grips with its drift. Sufism is where we come from. Not where he said we should be heading.

    The political and apolitical purposes don’t matter, the radicalism and militancy are the bane that need to be countered. If a particular faith says this is what it is about, thats fair business. If it says it is the only way, barring which all else are to be condemned to death, that isn’t. An inclusive form of religion is one where all can preach their faith, none may thrust it down another’s throat.

    The state won’t be doing moral schooling, it would be freeing the country’s faith from being manipulated for gains by foreign countries. Prosecution is only a palliative measure. We would have to strike at the bedrock of problem for there to be any meaningful progress. Until then no amount of punishments can rid us of the militancy issue.Recommend

  • Rana Eddy

    “Sufi Islam that Allama Iqbal had written,”

    The same Allama Iqbal was a pan-Islamist.Recommend