First execution in 6 years: Government plays with Shoaib’s life

Published: September 17, 2014

18 years have passed since the death sentence was given to Shoaib Sarwar by the trial court, which he has spent in a filthy cell.

Pakistan ranks sixth in the total number of people it executes after China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the United States. According to Amnesty International estimates, there are more than 8,500 prisoners on death row in Pakistan. The only legal method of killing a condemned prisoner is hanging them till their neck breaks.  According to the International Commission of Jurists, Pakistan is ‘part of a dwindling minority among states which have retained the death penalty and carry out executions’.

However, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s policy on the execution of death sentences is still at best – unclear.

An order issued by former president Asif Ali Zardari in 2008 had imposed a moratorium on the death penalty after which not a single civilian was hanged. The only execution carried out in six years was of a soldier, who was convicted by court martial, in 2008. The incumbent Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government had hinted to end the moratorium on execution after the expiration of presidential order.  However, upon Zardari’s request to not implement the death penalties as long as he was in office, PM Nawaz directed the interior ministry to put the executions on hold.  Former spokesman of interior ministry Omar Hamid Khan said at the time,

“As a responsible state, Pakistan respects the commitments it made with the international community and is determined not to implement the death sentences”.

It was, however, decided at one point that the moratorium would not be renewed after its expiry. When the EU cautioned Pakistan at one point that lifting the moratorium on the death penalty will be viewed as a major setback in the 28 member bloc and possibly adversely affect Islamabad’s quest for duty-free access to EU markets, PM Nawaz directed the halt on executions just days ahead of presenting a formal request for seeking duty free access.

As a result, a Pakistani civilian is paying the price of the government’s unclear and unvoiced policy on death sentences and it is indeed a heavy price to pay.

On July 22, 1998, 19-year-old Shoaib Sarwar was tried and convicted for murder. Various appeals were made highlighting his innocence but all were dismissed and mercy petitions rejected. But at one point, a note was issued on August 17, 2008 by the secretary to the PM expressing the desire of the prime minister to put execution of death sentence in abeyance until the discussion on the subject took place between the president and the prime minister. However, the stay on Sarwar’s execution was challenged and on July 17, 2014, the Rawalpindi Bench of the Lahore High Court abruptly and very wrongly ordered the authorities to hang Sarwar saying that,

“The desire of the president to discuss the matter with the PM was not indicative of a pardon”.

In what would have been a violation of international and domestic law, the doomful  sealing of the fate of 8,500 prisoners and an embarrassing act of barbarianism, Sarwar was ordered to be killed tomorrow while the government of Pakistan still remained mum on this issue. Luckily, in a last minute turn of events and all praise due to Justice Project Pakistan (JPP), an organisation which gives free legal aid to those on death row, the Rawalpindi Bench of the Lahore High Court of Justice Mahmood Maqbool Bajwa and Justice Aalia Neelum granted another stay on September 16, 2014 on the execution which would have been tomorrow.

Eighteen years have passed since the death sentence was given to Sarwar by the trial court, which he has spent in a filthy cell. Under precedent of our Federal Shariat Court (FSC), if you execute a prisoner after he has spent a long time on death row, this amounts to ‘double punishment’, cruel and inhuman treatment and  torture as per Article 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan. In Muhammad Aslam Khaki v Federation of Pakistan, it was stated:

“From the time the trial court awards the sentence of death, at the end of an agonising and protracted trial, up to the time of the acceptance or rejection of his mercy petition by the President of Pakistan… he has to pass through a distressing period of time awaiting confirmation of death sentence… The mercy petition is the last hope of a condemned prisoner. The conditions in which a condemned prisoner spends a trying period extending over a few years are simply deplorable, inhuman and unpardonable.”

‘Double punishment’, which is execution of a prisoner after he has already spent a long time in jail on death row  is now seen as an violation of human rights in many tribunals around the world.

Under international law, US lawyers call it the ‘death row phenomenon’. The FSC apparently simply calls it ‘deplorable’.

Therefore, although it is illegal for Sarwar to be executed, our authorities play with his life by changing their minds about it every day, which could only be a crude form of torture.

How many more civilians in Pakistan need to go through this till Nawaz finally finalises a policy on the death penalty which is in line with his international commitments, our law set by the FSC and just basic human decencies.

Mariam.Kizilbash

Mariam Kizilbash

The author read her LLM from University College of London and has worked in human rights NGOs in Islamabad and London. She is currently a legal researcher for Corruption Watch (UK).

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • Jamhoora

    I don’t think NS was the PM in 2008.Recommend

  • Fighter Man

    No Mercy for Killers. Killers must be hanged till death.Recommend

  • The number of people Pakistan executes and the number of people on death row are not the same things. Please be very careful about confusing vital stats through sweeping statements like that.Recommend

  • Abuzar Jamil

    This is democracy.A core issue like this should have one hard and fast rule or policy.But sadly these policies change with Nawaz and Zardari.Recommend

  • I am no fan of the death penalty, but the ET editor should at least have edited out the following loaded, ad hominem, or glaringly incorrect language:

    – Saying mercy petitions “highligh[ed] [the] innocence” of a convicted murderer whose appeals were all rejected is by definition incorrect

    – “August 17, 2008 by the secretary to the PM expressing the desire of PM Nawaz” – Nawaz was not PM in 2008.

    – “Rawalpindi Bench of the Lahore High Court abruptly and very wrongly” – What evidence does the author have of wrongdoing on part of the court? Is that just the author’s personal/normative judgment?

    – “an embarrassing act of barbarianism” – says who? Is that the best way to frame opposition to capital punishment and the acts of our country’s legal and judicial systems?

    These may appear like small things, but together they take away from the credibility of the argument and the publication.Recommend

  • Jehanzeb Mahar

    The federal shariat court supports the death penalty; but the author won’t write that. Secondly, who is responsible for such long delay in the carrying out of death sentences? The answer is: people who advocate the abolition of death death penalty, being ignorant of the cultural differences between our part of the world and the west. Revenge killings are rooted very deeply in our culture. Many of these 8,500 inmates remained alive just because the families of their victims believed that the killers of their loved ones would be hanged by the law. If you abolish the death penalty, revenge killings will increase.Recommend

  • Jehanzeb Mahar

    So much for the freedom of expresssion? You have disapproved my comment twice because I support the death penaltyRecommend

  • Moiz Omar

    Any person that has extremely strong evidence against them of being a murderer, rapist or acid-thrower deserve the death penalty.Recommend

  • Pro Truth

    isnt part of Pakistani Law that a murderer should be hanged if proven guilty and after exercising all available appeals! Why USA doesnt bother the world with its capital punishment but strangely it becomes issue if its Pakistan, China or other countries?Recommend

  • Mir

    Law of the country says. Hang the murder. Than why this delay, nothing but political gains by the Rulers. When these killers kills they have no mercy. This is only way to get rid of crimes.How any murders are committed in Pakistan during these years.Recommend

  • S Khan

    No such prosecution in previous years has caused outbreak of crimes in this country….for how long do we have to take dictation from the west??? This is
    our country and we will decide its faith…eliminate crime through criminal prosecution.Recommend

  • bush.

    why you choose not to mess with usa and china .Recommend