Watching Carl Sagan's documentary 'Cosmos' changed my life!

I decided to become an astronomer after watching Cosmos. It fundamentally changed the trajectory of my life.

Salman Hameed March 29, 2014
It was sudden. It was unexpected. I was in grade nine when my life took a dramatic turn. Like many of my peers at school, I was planning on pursuing electrical or computer engineering at NED University of Engineering and Technology. My father is an engineer and so is my eldest brother. The path seemed to have been laid out.

But then, on a fateful night, Cosmos got aired on Pakistan Television (PTV) and by the time the first episode ended, I had decided to become an astronomer. In less than an hour, a science poet from Brooklyn had fundamentally altered the trajectory of my life in Pakistan!

I don’t remember the exact date but this was some time in 1984. I had heard of neither Carl Sagan nor his Personal Voyage in the form of Cosmos. In fact, when I sat down to watch the first episode I was initially disappointed to find out that it was a documentary. I loved science fiction films but used to run away from documentaries. I was thirteen, can you blame me? But the name of the show, ‘cosmos’ fooled me. It sounded cool and mysterious.

Carl Sagan. Photo: Reuters

And then Carl Sagan, in his inimitable accent and style, invited us all to join him in the voyage:
“The surface of the earth is the shore of the cosmic ocean. On this shore we’ve learned most of what we know. Recently we’ve waded a little way out, maybe ankle-deep, and the water seems inviting. Some part of our being knows this is where we came from. We long to return. And we can. Because the cosmos is also within us. We’re made of star-stuff. We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.”

I was hooked.

The first episode ended with Sagan’s famous cosmic calendar, where the entire history of the universe was compressed into one year. The Big Bang happened on January 1. In this calendar, the Sun and the planets formed only in September, and life arose on September 21. Modern humans appear at 11:52pm on December 31, and the entire written history would lie within the last 13 seconds of the cosmic year.



The episode ended, but I remember sitting in stunned silence for a little while. For the first time, I had encountered the true enormity of space and time.

I had fallen in love with astronomy. Through Cosmos, I found out that one could be a professional astronomer. This was a revelation: You can get paid to do what you really love to do!

17 years after the airing of Cosmos in Pakistan, I obtained my doctorate in astronomy in the US. Carl Sagan died in 1996 and I never got a chance to thank him personally for transforming my life via a picture tube.

I routinely watch clips of Cosmos for inspiration. I have the series on iTunes, DVD and, yes, even on VHS. I want to make sure that in case of a technological apocalypse, one of these formats will allow me the continued pleasure of being awed by Sagan’s personal voyage into the cosmos.

Now I await the premiere of the new Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, hosted by Neil deGrasse Tyson. By all accounts, it looks dazzling. Tyson, himself, is an outstanding communicator of science and a worthy successor of Sagan. I’m excited to see this updated Cosmos. So much has happened in astronomy since the first Cosmos – planets around other stars, an accelerating universe, dark matter, dark energy and much more.

Neil deGrasse Tyson talks about the new Cosmos. Photo: Reuters

But in all honesty, I’m also a bit apprehensive.



Sagan is often portrayed primarily as a science communicator. But I think his biggest contribution was to provide us with a rich and sensitive humanistic view of the universe. He managed to balance awe and humility in the face of the enormous cosmos uncovered by science.

I hope the new Cosmos finds a way to retain this spirit.
WRITTEN BY:
Salman Hameed The author is an associate professor of integrated science and humanities at Hampshire College, Massachusetts, USA. He runs a Youtube channel of astronomy videos (KianaatAstronomyInUrdu) and tweets @salmanahameed (https://twitter.com/salmanahameed)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (18)

Alp Arslan | 9 years ago | Reply I saw Cosmos II and I have learned one thing in this documentary. Question authority, but not religious which is Tyson's call, but scientific establishment when they claim mythical explanations as fact. That's my call. The fable he tells about arrival of the eye in this documentary is impossible mathematically. No material proof for that too. He claims that artificial seclection of wolves demonstrates how evolution can make dogs from wolves. But that only demonstrates scrambling of existing information. No new information was generated in those 15000 years. That doesn't explain how wolves 'emerged' in the first place. That doesn't explain how this can be extrapolated to a unicellular bacteria. "The cosmos is all there is, or ever was, or ever will be". That's no physics, that's metaphysics. That's a philosophical statement, a faith a similar thing from which cosmos wants to draw its viewers away. Separation of religion and state. I don't know what that's doing in cosmos. If that had to be mentioned then why wasn't it mentioned that natural philosophy/progress excelled in Islamic Golden ages where religion was integral part of the state. Cosmos mentions Caliphate which is a religious term not secular. Moses, Jesus, Muhammad came that many seconds ago. I don't know what religious personalities (peace be upon them) are doing in a science documentary. 'Newton's laws swept away the need of a master clockmaker to explain the precision of the solar system'. Here again 'traditional faith' being declared unimportant. "Gravity is god". Metaphysics. This documentary taught me the fact that metaphysics is more important than physics and one should concentrate more on that. Bruno was not killed for his cosmology as cosmos shows and purports him as 'martyr of science'. He was sentenced for theological reasons such as challenging the divinity of Jesus, trinity and pantheism etc. Overall I was disappointed with the experience. I know metaphysics is more important to a human being than physics. And it 'spills over' unintentionally when one expresses his thoughts. But I have seen other documetaries which contained ideology but were lot different. This was clearly taking along an idealogical agenda. Looked more like an atheism 'evangelism'.
Ajay Mittal | 9 years ago | Reply What a life story !
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ