Dear leaders, if you can't protect drone victims, let the K-P government do it

I do not stand by any particular party. I stand by whoever is fighting against the terror Nabila faces.

Shoaib Saleem December 05, 2013
Dear Mr Rana Sanaullah, Shahbaz Sharif and Pervez Rasheed, 

I write this piece in response to your criticism over the NATO supply blockade by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government.

Although Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) members would give complicated arguments regarding dignity, terrorism and radicalisation against your views, my focus is relatively simple.

Just take a look at the picture of Nabila Rehman showing a drawing she crafted over fear of drone strikes.

Nine-year-old Nabila Rehman shows her drawing on drone strikes at the start of a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on Tuesday. Photo: Reuters

Gentlemen, I do not know if drones kill terrorists. I do not know if they are counterproductive. I do not know if drone strikes are causing radicalisation in the society.

What I do know is that this girl lives in fear.

Instead of crafting happiness, she is crafting fear.

Any ethical, democratic government would claim it to be their responsibility to protect her. Considering it is your responsibility, what have you done to protect her? What have you done to protect thousands of other children like Nabila who are crafting fear in their drawings?

You might be right in your argument that the K-P government and protesters are taking unconstitutional measures by blocking the Nato supply route.

But have you left them with any other choice?

Supporters of Pakistan's Islamist party Pasban hold placards as they shout anti-American slogans during a protest in Karachi October 23, 2013, against US drone attacks in Pakistan. Photo: Reuters

We saw our prime minister’s (PM) silence over drones in his visit to the US.

We saw how much credibility there is in the statements of the adviser to PM on foreign affairs.

U.S. President Barack Obama shakes hands with Pakistan's Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington October 23, 2013. Photo: Reuters

Is there anything else left to prove that the PML-N government is no different to PPP when it comes to foreign policy?

Haven’t we seen enough already?

Students gather at the site of a suspected U.S. drone strike on an Islamic seminary in Hangu district, bordering North Waziristan, November 21, 2013. Photo: Reuters

You say taking US aid and stopping drones cannot happen together.

Well, the K-P government has already shown that they can take US aid and side by side, stop the Nato supply routes in protest. At least they are sending a message conveying our resentment to the world in general and the US in particular.

What has the federal government done to fight Nabila’s fears? We haven’t even seen any meaningful measures to stop drone strikes.

This is my humble request to the federal government -- if you are not doing anything meaningful to end Nabila’s fears, please do not criticise those who are willing to fight for her.

I do not stand by any particular party. I stand by whoever is fighting against the terror Nabila faces.
WRITTEN BY:
Shoaib Saleem A graduate from the Australian National University pursuing Chartered Accountancy as a career and seeking peace within my soul. I am currently based in Sydney. He tweets @ShoaibAdmani (https://twitter.com/ShoaibAdmani)
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (82)

War profiteer | 10 years ago | Reply o yea I found them in my house! *I am shivering with fear, help me my best ally!*
Ammar | 10 years ago | Reply Yes Think.. think there can be any suicide attacker in any Jaloos or gathering.. yes think.. But you don't nuke the whole jaloos and say you MIGHT have killed a suicide bomber who MIGHT be in the Jaloos. hence the point in the original post. Get educated bro !
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ