How to write an article on Pakistan (for the foreign press)

A satire about the pros and cons of writing a piece on Pakistan and its effects for the foreign press.

Jahanzaib Haque November 08, 2013
Dear journalist, blogger, columnist or on-again, off-again writer, congratulations! You have chosen to cover Pakistan in an article aimed at a global audience and (fingers crossed) paid for by a foreign news service/agency.

Your guide awaits you below – check off your game plan and repeat ad nauseum.

STEP 1: Choose your topic

A: I want to write on terrorism, the impact of the US exit from Afghanistan, drone attacks, the tribal badlands, ‘Nuclear-armed’ dangers and Pakistan’s foreign policy in general.
Pros: I can be an expert on all the above thanks to Google and many hours of spare time.

Cons: There is an average of 100 articles per day on the above (damn).

B: I want to write on the restive Balochistan province, the separatist insurgency, Gwadar, China, secret wars, missing persons, government neglect, the plight of the common folk and foreign policy in general.
Pros: Way more ‘hip’ than covering terrorism in the tribal badlands.

Cons: I can’t Google my way through this. Too little information (making copy-paste and rewording hard), and too many dodgy sources. Also fewer analysts available.

C: I want to write a positive Pakistan story, grounded in the people, civil society, fashion, music, art, innovation, business. All of this couched in the context of ‘terrorism in the tribal badlands’ and ‘conservative Islamic culture’ of course, else it won’t sell.
Pros: I can probably roam around the streets and find something or the other. Maybe attend a party. Maybe a fashion show. Maybe a restaurant launch. It’s essentially a non-time bound one-note wonder.

Cons: The story is only as interesting as it can be juxtaposed against terrorism, Islam etc. Can’t write too many of these, or do follow-ups.

D: I can wait till disaster strikes someone important or somewhere significant and write on that! If the disaster can be framed in the context of terrorism and religion, I score double. Triple if I get a photograph.
Pros: It might actually count as a real story and give me some reporting cred.

Cons: I might actually have to get out and cover something, probably on a deadline.

STEP 2: Gather information

A: I can exit my house. Some leg work may be required for some topics. Alternately, I could pay real reporters to do the leg work for me! Yeah, that works.

B: I can Google it all! Seriously, there is a lot of good content online that no one has read yet and can be rehashed. Also, Twitter and a couple of online analytics tools can help me drill down which articles are trending online. Then it’s just a matter of reproducing them, commenting on their merits/demerits, or even better, taking two of them and mashing them together!

C: I can read Pakistani newspapers every day and redo (read: steal) their exclusives! All I need to do to ‘own’ the story is to insert new quotes from a couple of sources (hopefully already mentioned in the story) and maybe a few analysts I have on speed-dial (Hassan Askari Rizvi, Ayesha Siddiqa and so on).

D: I can just listen to all the drawing room gossip around me and filter it into an article. I can spin the hearsay into ‘some analysts’, named or unnamed ‘sources’, ‘the talk in X city’ or just call the whole damn thing ‘zeitgeist’.

STEP 3: Write the article

A: My introduction needs to have a killer hook that establishes the subject matter in the context a foreign reader enjoys i.e. the above-mentioned terrorism, religious conservatism, dangers, threats etc. The more extreme the contrast of subject matter, the better!

B: My quotes from various sources should fit the pre-written context and overall theme of disaster, gloom or positive-story-despite-the-madness. If they do not fit the overall theme, I should go back and get some new quotes that fit my preconceived article, or try to reshape and rewrite the quotes so they work the way I want them to.

C: If I have Googled my way through writing most of the article, I should probably run it through anti-plagiarism software. I can further rewrite bits that are being highlighted as plagiarized, or I can write a preemptive clever defense of the stolen bits, to be emailed out if anyone catches on.

STEP 4: Send it off for publishing

A: I can send the article to NYT, The Guardian, Christian Science Monitor and other top tier foreign press that pay well and have space for Pakistan-based content!

B: If that fails, I can send it to second tier foreign press and blogs like Foreign Policy or Huffington Post. I might not get paid, but my next article can say I write for the foreign press and that should give me some clout with the top tier.

C: I can always spam the article to the local English press and blogs and hope for the best. Koi to challa dey ga.

COMMENTS (24)

Jawwad Shah | 10 years ago | Reply Brilliant! :D
Talha Rizvi | 10 years ago | Reply When did I say that muslims can't be terrorists? Lalagee is an extreme right-winger while I have always condemned right-wingers. Now about people posting using false nicks here are some examples: Water bottle on a girl from a slum going to the US for studies: She should move to Pakistan and join a madrassa. Darbullah on Government banning Skype: We shouldn't be using internet as our ancestors the Arabs didn't have them( neither did the Aryans - my addition) I can quote on and on and what's more some people actually believe they are Pakistanis and use their sarcastic comments to bash Pakistan. It is funny you mention petty name calling because that's all you guys are good at. As for multiple nicks didn't you notice lol,raj,lalakimaa,pakkimaa as being nicks of the same person. The extremely bad language and poor grammar is common in them. If you who is a self-styled intellectual can't notice this you are either okay with these shenanigans or are woefully lacking in observation. I welcome criticism but people who make fun of people dying in incidents of terrorism even natural disasters don't deserve my respect or are even fit to be called humans according to me.
Anooop | 10 years ago Stop being the Internet Police. If you find an argument worth replying for, do it. By rehashing the same comment as a reply for everyone, thereby being the troll you accuse other to be, who are trying to satisfy or correct? Clearly some people, a lot of them do not pretend to be anything.but themselves. Get fresh man. Come up with new ideas and arguments. If not Internet is not the right place for you.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ