Who’s keeping the media honest?

Published: October 26, 2011

How long will journalists compromise their integrity, by just focussing on selling big, for a fat pay cheque?

There was once a famous conspiracy theory which accused news media of pandering to a select lobby and manipulating the masses. For quite some time, I dismissed such claims as grade ‘A’ YouTube regurgitations. However, as social media evolved and began providing more than just couch entertainment, it became increasingly clear that everything is not black and white.

The events of this year, from the Arab Spring to the ongoing ‘Occupy’ protests world wide remind us that technology has, as always, favoured freedom. Real time availability of news from all quarters of the world is a press of a button away on your smart phone. And so, it is difficult to understand why internationally renowned news groups continue to disappoint an increasingly informed audience.

Occupy protests

Western media mostly ignored the protests on Wall Street initially.  But as the numbers and persistence of the protesters grew, the media were soon forced to attend the festivities. Even when the media giants arrived at the party, they unanimously portrayed the protesters as dead beats of society congregating to cause disruption. Sound bytes repeated in print and TV all said the same thing, “the protesters have no real goal”. Thus, giving the listener the idea that these protesters are simply wasting time. Indeed, millions will have believed this. That is, until you start to seek out the information you want elsewhere. Al Jazeera ran one of the best news reports on why the media is blacking out the protests. I am not claiming that Al Jazeera is carrying the flag for truth, but at least they remind their audience that in this day in age, it is unacceptable to blame media hypocrisy for lack of information, as it’s readily available. Fat chance you’ll ever hear CNN say that.

Who is Ron Paul?

Another example of the US media’s hypocrisy is in their ignorance towards famous American GOP candidate, Ron Paul.

If you don’t know who this man is  it’s not your fault. He has been a victim of media black out because he is the only vociferous anti-war politician. He may as well be the most consistent and earnest politician in the world, yet he is sidelined by the media.

Paul’s anti-establishment, pro-libertarian stance is gaining immense popularity. His message of freedom, peace and a return to strict adherence to the American constitution are crucial. Any one who has read the American constitution will agree that it is one of the finest set of governing principles for any country to follow. It is what makes America great. Instead of being showered with attention, this man is being ignored by the powers who have control. Paul’s popularity is growing thanks to the social media, and also due to unlikely sources. This brilliant segment from comedian Jon Stewart showed the world how ignorant and manipulative the news media can be.

Here in Pakistan

We see examples of such blatant ignorance by the media in Pakistan too. While some news organizations will go to great lengths to blast Imran Khan and other politicians, they will hold back their tirade on other notorious political parties. Lucman may invite Ali Azmat to propagate deranged conspiracy theories for viewers but such fear generating mechanisms are common all over the world. Fox News does this on a nightly basis. So, the question that arises is, why does the society of journalists sit quietly and let all this slide?

In New York Times

The New York Times issue from October 18 featured two front page pictures. One showing Israeli children playing merrily and the other showing an angry looking militia man from Palestine holding a gun. Who needs words when pictures speak a thousand? The contrast between the pictures showed exactly which side the reader should sympathize with.

Another news paper in Toronto carried the headline “terrorists, killers released in exchange for Shalit”. Needless to say, it failed to mention if the released prisoners were ever given fair trial or that some of them were children.  Given the overwhelming support for Palestine in the recent UN General Assembly, it is surprising that the media and journalists turned their backs to the oppressed people. Is it safe to say then, that these so-called journalists are bought out and paid for not doing their job, but to forward propaganda? The jury is out there.

How long will this trend continue before the news giants realize that their credibility is sinking? How long will it take for the community of journalists to come together to support the truth and shun sell outs? And so ring words from the recent movie, Contagion. Jude Law plays the role of a famous investigative blogger whose crucial story is denied a place in a big newspaper by the editor. As he storms out of the office, he yells to the editor:

“Print media is dying, Lorraine. . .I’ll save you a seat on the bus”.

These words ought to resonate loud and clear for journalists who compromise their integrity for a fat pay cheque.

said.chaudhry

Said Chaudhry

A doctor and cricket fanatic who blogs at saidcanblog.blogspot.com and tweets @saidation

The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.

  • waqqas iftikhar

    brilliant man….absolutely true….every word of itRecommend

  • http://natashasuleman.wordpress.com Natasha Suleman

    That was some real good stuff you came up with Said. Loved reading it.Recommend

  • zehra

    very good , i hope you write again with more focus and analysis of the pakistani media and their behaviourRecommend

  • zakir

    appreciate tribune and the writer, they(the journalists) don’t realize that they are themselves the ones who need to read rather than write, so disappointed with pak journalist…. Recommend

  • http://lonepkliberal.wordpress.com Loneliberal PK

    Journalists, like all free humans, can be partial on political issues. That’s why it’s important not to fixate on the same media source, make use of the variety that is available to you.

    If the OWS movement wasn’t given sufficient coverage by the mainstream media, how has this fever so quickly swept over the whole world from Italy to Australia? I don’t know what kind of media the author has been following, but I’ve heard nothing but good things about the Wall Street from world-renowned journalists, essayists, bloggers and twitterati!

    Internet has single-handedly killed one-sided and yellow journalism. It is the responsibility of the consumer to not believe every printed or spoken word thrown at him by the media, but to confirm that news through multiple sources.Recommend

  • narejo

    In contagion, jude law plays a blogger who, in collaboration with a pharma company, is falsely promoting a medicine as cure for the virus. Everyone has an agenda my friend, including you who is not present on mainstream media.Recommend

  • http://dinopak.wordpress.com Hasan

    You talk about keeping media honest. There is ignorance spread wide in the nation. The thing is, no one does research, our anchors are ill informed about everything they touch. May it be anything, any topic.

    Here is a fine example, Mr. Paracha pulls something out of the scriptures and distort it in public, yet no one dared to go back (even after the show) and research his comment. It’s on the air, millions of viewers are watching, and there is a live audience present. Yet no one dared to question him on this.Recommend

  • Abdul Rehman Gilani

    @Hasan:

    Regardless of what Mr. Paracha says, the Federal Shariat Courts decision is clear, let there be no mistake about it.Recommend

  • Samina

    I usually don’t read blogs on ET cause their quality has hit rock bottom. After reading Your blog I must say, u have done a good job and made me reconsider my decision. Hope to read more from you.Recommend

  • http://dinopak.wordpress.com Hasan

    @Abdul Rehman Gilani:

    I am sorry, but a person is distorting Quran on live television, is that not a religious crime?Recommend

  • Nafisa

    Intriguing.Recommend

  • Silent Observer

    I think it is the marriage of the media and the judiciary which has transformed Pakistan’s political landscape. Independent media and a pro-active judiciary are the two pre-requisites for a strong democratic state as it is a panacea for many of the shortcomings of our democratic system, mainly a lack of accountability. Recommend

  • http://solomon2.blogspot.com Solomon2

    “Another news paper in Toronto carried the headline “terrorists, killers released in exchange for Shalit”. Needless to say, it failed to mention if the released prisoners were ever given fair trial or that some of them were children. ”

    Odd that the author refrained from researching the facts of these matters himself. Or maybe he/she did and is just keeping the truth away from his readers?Recommend

  • http://dinopak.wordpress.com Hasan

    @Solomon2:

    And what is the truth? Isn’t it obvious how Israel kept 1000′s of prisoners which by the way not only include Palestinians but there are Lebanese there also. If you have any figures about the trials, do share with us.

    None of the prisoners have been given any fair trial, they are locked up without any conviction. Recommend

  • sajid

    Very good article. If we talk about Pakistan then I remeber a couple of years ago punjab assembly tried to make laws about regulating the media but the media blasted the legislator who introduced the law and he had to resign. There were rallies by journalists all over punjab to stop the law from being passed. It was seen as an attack on freedom of speech.
    Unfortunately out of all the countries you mentioned Pakistan is the one which needs media regulation laws asap. Our media shows adress and phone numbers of rape victims, does programs supporting killers like qadri, supports terrorists, incites religious violence against minorities esp. ahmadies,shows violence, deadbodies etc. however whenever any body tries to control them they spill on to the streets taking it as an attack on the freedom of media.Recommend