Misbah-ul-Haq poses with the ICC Champions Trophy, ICC Champions Trophy 2017, Karachi, March 30, 2017. PHOTO: PCB.

Misbahul Haq, the man who broke cricket beyond repair

Under Misbah, Pakistan’s natural attacking nous, aggression and raw power died a slow, poisonous death.

Zohaib Majeed April 10, 2017
As ungentlemanly as it is to castigate someone in the aftermath of a retirement, such is the rage I harbour for the man named Misbahul Haq that I’ll break this sporting code.

Before I tear into my vitriolic rant, I’ll start by saying that I have nothing against Misbah ‘the person’. In fact, as a captain, he did a stellar job staying clear of any controversies a la the Salman Butts and Wasim Akrams of these shores. I’ll give him that. Statistically speaking too, Misbah, I’ve come to know, was better than some of our better ones. He also deserves some marks for taking the armband in 2010 — a time when it was more a poisoned chalice than an honour.

But my beef with Misbah isn’t about numbers. It isn’t even about how he calmed a sinking ship and cleaned up our rotten image... until it became rottener.

A dejected Misbah-ul-Haq leaves the field after holing out, Australia v Pakistan, 3rd Test, Sydney, 3rd day, January 5, 2017.Photo: AFP

Trust me, I’m not even holding against him the fact that we lost the World T20 final against India. After all, per Misbah fanboy logic, that doesn’t even count since it was him who had single-handedly brought us to that place. The point is that he may have a winning ratio beyond 100%, he may have played a cleaner better than even Harvey Keitel himself, but Misbah will always remain the man who took the joy of cricket from me.

Misbah-ul-Haq chases the ball, Australia v Pakistan, 3rd Test, Sydney, 1st day, January 3, 2017.Photo: Getty images

Under this particular Mianwali-born, Pakistan’s natural attacking nous, aggression, raw power — all ethos of our cricketing culture — died a slow, poisonous death. Instead of being a proactive, in-your-face side as we always were, Misbah’s Pakistan cricket team became a timid creature, happy to simply react and dance to others’ tunes rather than set the tone itself. The deeper we went into the Misbah era, the good old days of taking the game to the opposition became more and more a distant memory.

On a good day, Misbah and his men would batter lowly opposition to beef up their ‘winning percentage’. A bad day would see him fold his arms up and run his hand through his beard as if some masterly plan was in the making. The session would end, the day would end, the match would end, but the conjuring of the grand plan wouldn’t. And instead of offsetting his contagious defensive mind-set with more vibrant personalities, the Tuk Tuk maestro stockpiled on cricketers cut from the same cloth as himself.

Pakistan captain Misbah-ul-Haq lofts one down the ground, Pakistan v West Indies, 2nd Test, Abu Dhabi, 1st day, October 21, 2016.Photo: AFP

So while the world went Abraham Benjamin de Villiers, we went Azhar Ali. The world churned out Virat Kohlis and we’d emit a measly Asad Shafiq (the ODI one). This was the Misbah effect.

Before Misbah trudged up the field with his sleepy face and Mianwali drawl, the country had an embarrassment of riches in the aggression department. The pool was so rich with attack-first talent that our selectors regularly binned world-class players just because they could afford to.

Misbah-ul-Haq celebrates a hundred on his first appearance at Lord's, England v Pakistan, 1st Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day, July 14, 2016.Photo: Getty Images

There was always someone waiting in the wings who could smack till his bat broke or bowl till his back broke. Not in the Misbah era though. The man has sucked every drop of excitement out of the game. And for that, as far as I am concerned, he will always remain the man who broke cricket beyond repair.
WRITTEN BY:
Zohaib Majeed
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (34)

anon | 6 years ago | Reply Absolutely useless article. You castigate him for the very thing that kept Pak cricket afloat. You wanted him to be aggressive when morale was low? When pak cricket was on the brink? If it wasn't for him, 2010 would have been the beginning of the end.
Saeed | 6 years ago | Reply What on earth was this? Super bad judgement.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ