Capitalism: A blessing in disguise

Capitalism has lifted millions of people out of poverty since its concluding triumph over socialism two decades ago.

Kazim Alam September 15, 2012
The word ‘capitalism’ — or sarmaya darana nizam’ — has always had an unpleasant ring to it in Urdu language newspapers. That’s probably why one rarely finds a politician in Pakistan praising capitalism.

Even our public intellectuals tend to carefully add qualifiers such as economic justice and social equity while calling for a free-market economy. However, shouldn’t the centrally planned economic system, rather than capitalism, stand discredited after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991? After all, capitalism has lifted millions of people out of poverty since its concluding triumph over socialism two decades ago. A cursory look at growth statistics reveals the unprecedented expansion that capitalism has caused in the global economy.

Between 1990 and 2010, the global GDP increased from $22.1 trillion to $62 trillion while emerging markets accounted for over half of this worldwide growth. Calling it the largest economic expansion in human history, political analyst Fareed Zakaria argues that it was actually spurred by a huge movement of western capital to Asia and all over the globe.

One has to be utterly biased to deny that the unhindered movement of capital and transfer of technology across borders — two of the many features of capitalism — have facilitated the entry of roughly two billion people into the global economy as active participants.

Most of these people belong to the emerging markets which, until a few decades ago, had dysfunctional, centrally planned economies, such as China and India. Against this backdrop, 100 per cent of global growth in 2009 came from the same emerging markets, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

It is evident that the real beneficiaries of capitalism — a system often derided as being predatory, greedy and crony, by old-school revolutionaries — are the citizens of the emerging economies. According to the September edition of Finance and Development, an IMF publication, per-capita income in emerging and developing economies has grown almost three times as fast as in advanced economies during the past two decades. After the global economic slowdown in 2009, the emerging markets and developing economies recovered with a growth rate of six per cent in 2010 compared with just 2.3 per cent for advanced economies.
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings”, said Winston Churchill, but “the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”

It’s up to us whether we want to share blessings or miseries.

Read more by Kazim here.

Join us on Facebook for blog updates and more!
WRITTEN BY:
Kazim Alam
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necassarily reflect the views and policies of the Express Tribune.

COMMENTS (16)

Abid P Khan | 11 years ago | Reply @Abdullah Ansari: Capitalism: “Where everything is for the rich and nothing is for the poor” In Capitalism, there is far greater lot for the poor, misery, hopelessness.
Intelektual | 11 years ago | Reply Y the need to confirm to One form of "ism" When the fact is that most economies are infact hybrid y is there a need to defend/Advertise Capitalisim. In its Pure form Capitalisim do have disadvantages the main one being the focus on Numbers and Money alone ignoring the Human element as can be seen with most examples above ! Those are only what Urdu's "Sarmayadarana nizam" point to.. A free and fair market regualted not by Buisinessmen but the consumer is the norm now y still an argument on Clasical standpoints.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ