Why The Hunger Games is the anti-Twilight
While Twilight compelled you to be either Team Edward or Team Jacob, The Hunger Games is refreshingly different.
Movies don’t tell you what to think, they tell you how to think.
If you saw Twilight then you know that the movie never said she needs to pick Edward; it said she needs to pick someone. This 16-year-old girl needs to decide right now, among the limited number of people she knows, which boy she is in real-true-forever-love with.
If you are a Twilight fan, you are probably either Team Edward or Team Jacob – that’s a given. And if you are, you feel the other team is wrong. The point isn’t whether Bella would be happier with Jacob or if she belongs with Edward; the point is that you are asking this question.
Why is this the most important question in the series? It doesn’t matter if she survives the vampire attacks, or if she lives with her father or mother or if she moves away. You don’t care how she’s doing at school, or what her career prospects are. She doesn’t have any real friends aside from Jacob and he’s only friends with her because he has a crush on her. From the very beginning it is almost obvious that Bella will end up with Edward. She has eyes for him only – her entire life revolves around him.
So why does a Team Jacob even exist?
Here’s the answer: To provide the illusion of choice.
A rebellious viewer may think that the movie is telling them that Bella needs to pick Edward and that is her only choice, so they’ll reject that conditioning and say they would rather she choose Jacob.
This is why I love The Hunger Games.
The audience is roughly the same as that of Twilight and so of course, Team Peeta and Team Gale duly appeared. Simultaneously, people who really paid attention quickly formed Team Katniss. While they may have enjoyed Katniss’ interactions with one or both of the boys, (and some of them may have had strong preferences as to which boy was better), they all understood her love life was only one aspect and did not define her in any way.
Girls who loved Twilight come away from it saying “I want a boyfriend like Edward or Jacob” and boys may say “I need to be more like Edward to get a girl” (not necessarily a girl like Bella but any girl). Girls who loved The Hunger Games on the other hand say “I want to be like Katniss” – so do the boys. Gender lines are blurred; she’s not just a girl, not an object for boys to fight over and not a thing to be controlled. She is a person with her own agency. Go Team Katniss!
Katniss has real relationships with both these boys. She may or may not have romantic feelings for either of them but she cares about them both and not for mystical magical ‘true love’ reasons. Her potential love interests have actual human characteristics instead of just archetypes. Her choice isn’t between the mysterious bad boy who seems dangerous but is really just misunderstood, and the safe choice who adores her indiscriminately. All three of these people are fully three-dimensional, equally flawed and heroic; they each have good and bad qualities.
Gale is her best friend, her hunting buddy. He has the same problems she has – they understand each other. She admires his desire to fight injustices and right the wrongs; he represents everything her life was before the game. They have their fire in common. As her fellow competitor, Peeta is the only person she can really trust, she has had to put her life in his hands. She admires his compassion and ability to love. What they have in common is their willingness to sacrifice themselves.
While the ambiguity of love and the nuances in human relationships is very unusual and fascinating on its own, what elevates this love story is that at least part of it is faked. In Peeta’s interview, he professes his love to Katniss just to create a narrative, because he knows that’s what the audience wants. He may actually love her but that is not why he says it – he says it to save her, to manipulate the system, to use its own rules against it. To the casual observer, he comes across as a lovesick puppy, but that’s only because that’s what he wants to come across as. He understands that the person who wins the games isn’t necessarily the strongest but the one that the audience wants to win.
Susan Collins doesn’t write in a vacuum. The audience of Twilight roots for Bella and Edward because they are “in love”, so her character employs this tactic to get the audience inside the book to root for Peeta and Katniss and this makes the audience outside the book root for them too.
The audience outside the book knows this. But if we were watching the games, the way the people of the capitol are without any context and without the benefit of seeing Katniss’ perspective, would we buy into the fiction of their love?
How much of it is fiction and how are their real feelings towards each other influenced by it? Would we still see it as Katniss’ story of survival or would it become another tale of “love can beat all odds”?
The love story is easier to digest for the people of the capital and perhaps by us as well. We ask whether you are Team Edward or Team Jacob because that’s an easier question than “Do we search for love because it’s what we want or because its what we are told we want?”
Read more by Hala here and follow her on Twitter @halasyed
The views expressed by the writer and the reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of The Express Tribune.



wow so true, deep <3Recommend
Apples and Oranges, people!
Comparing these two is like comparing American Pie with Die Hard! They’re not even the same genre!Recommend
Right to the point!
This is why I love The Hunger Games too!Recommend
Suzanne Collins not susan, still Great review!Recommend
I hate the Twilight series as much as the next guy, but not every book and movie is there to teach us a lesson, and not every character has to be a role model.
No, The Lorax was not meant to brainwash kids into hating corporations. And the Twilight series are not meant to teach girls the importance of finding boyfriends.
Sometimes a romantic story is just a romantic story, and simply meant to entertain. You don’t read Romeo and Juliet and protest, “Hey girl, why dont cha quit cryin’ about that crazy Romeo boy and go get yourself a job!”Recommend
@iSayed: you are absolutely right
this isn’t about one thing being better than the other
comparing the books or movies as a whole is impossible
they are very different stories with very different themes
the thing they have in common is that they are intended for roughly the same demographic audience and narrated by 16 year old girls that have been disappointed in the adults in their lives and that each contains a love triangle
i think looking at the different ways the trope of the love triangle is used, is fair to compareRecommend
@Faraz Talat:
I think its important to think about things. .
the stories we tell our selves are important
“I don’t think any of us really believes that there’s a moment onscreen, or a word on the page, that got there by its own accord. I think we owe it to the artist to at least try and follow along.” Jacob Clifton
the writer makes deliberate choices. we should consider why they make those particular choices. saying its just random or to entertain takes all credit away from them
if greedy corporations are often used as the villain in children’s stories there is a reason for it. people are suspicious of them. and of course children will be slightly suspicious of them too when they are used this way. its a cycle of life imitating art imitating life.
you will never be entertained by something that you do not relate to at some level. instead of saying “its just a romantic story” (and thereby undermining the feelings of millions who connect with it) why not wonder why we need to hear the romantic story in the first place
“There’s some phrase, I think it’s in Chaucer, about how everything that’s written is didactic. As soon as you write something down, as long as it’s not a shopping list, it’s some idea about the world. It’s Michel de Montaigne writing his essays, it’s Plato writing The Republic, it’s Ron writing Battlestar. All of these things concern human beings, and somebody’s idea about them. Everything that we write is to teach ourselves in some way to behave better, to think more, or to think differently. And if the thing you’re doing doesn’t actually address any of those, then maybe you are writing a shopping list.” James CallisRecommend
@Hala:
i understand the obvious cliched hatred you have for twilight the book isnt meant to be thought provoking but are you suggesting hunger games is?? and moreover the book twilight is much more detailed version and the movie does no justice. and here in your article you are talkiing about the hunger games movie or the book?? and is it actually worth spending 800 per book?Recommend
@confused:
i have no cliched hatred for twilight
and i think it is thought provoking
thats why i have so many thoughts about it
i’m not dismissing it as silly entertainment for girls
i’m saying its important and has an impact
“thought provoking” isn’t about the entertainment it is about the viewer
i feel like you misunderstood my article, the title was inaccurate and misleading
this isn’t about one thing being better than the other, its about how both have used a similar trope in different ways, and mostly the reaction of the fans
i didn’t disparage “twilight” the book or movie in any way. i called into question the fans forming teams as the most important take away from the storyRecommend
Hala,
I believe in the subjective appeal of artwork. Not everybody derives the same meaning from it.
I don’t believe that these stories hang in aether, or a strange dimension that has nothing to do with the way the modern world works. But we relate it in different ways.
While you might view Twilight as the tale of a damsel in distress, trying to find a boyfriend to watch over her, some might see Twilight as the story of a person standing up for what she believes in, regardless of the adversity that comes her way (let’s not forget that the saga features some strong female characters too, like Alice and Rosalie)
While some view The Lorax as a message that all corportations are evil, others may see it as a simple lesson against greed, and the importance of protecting the environment.
Some stories are hideously and undeniably anti-feminist, like the Indian soap-operas and even Humsafar, which shamelessly casts every strong and outspoken woman as a villiainess, and meek, helpless women as heroines. But Meyer’s books are primarily about romance in a fantasy world of vampires and werewolves, and should be enjoyed as such (I wouldn’t defend the movies if my life depended on it!).
But I agree that the The Hunger Games is better than Twilight in almost every way.Recommend
I left reading midway because I suspected a spoiler ! (haven’t seen the movie yet)Recommend
They do infact share a genre- both fall under Fantasy however twilight is fantasy, Romance whereas The Hunger Games is not a romance. @iSayed:
P.S I loved The Hunger Games, have not enjoyed anything so much since Harry Potter. Don’t compare it to Twilight which I found dull at best. Recommend